marxistcriticismfredricjameson-文庫吧資料
2024-10-20 15:28本頁面
【正文】 interpreted in terms of the economic and social conditions of its production and by the class status of its author. However, he insisted, more than anybody else, on the traditional Marxist reflectionist theory, even when this theory was under severe attack from the formalists in the fifties. In Art and Objective Truth (1954), he criticized two fallacies of mimesis, namely, false objectivism for its mechanistic materialism and false subjectivism for its idealism. The typical example of the former is literary naturalism, while for the latter it is the subjectoriented criticism. Early Western Marxism ? Mikhail M. Bakhtin ? In “Discourse in the Novel” written in the thirtieth, Bakhtin, like Luk225。 ” ——德里達： 《 馬克思的幽靈 》 Part 1 Marxist Criticism ? division of Marxism ? classical Marxism ? early Western Marxism ? late Marxism ? Note: It is to be noted that this division, though chronological in nature, by no means indicates the later period was to replace the former. They in fact coexist with a plex interconnection in between. classical Marxism ? The classical Marxist criticism flourished chiefly in a period from Marx and Engels to the Second World War. It characterizes itself by an insistence on at least the following basic tes: materialism, economic determinism, class struggle, surplus value, reification, proletarian revolution and munism. Marx and Engels were political philosophers rather than literary critics, but the scant and fragmentary aesthetic ments they had made enabled people after them to build a theory out of them. Marx, for instance, made the famous “ideology critique” in The Holy Family on Eug232。Marxist Criticism amp。 Fredric Jame
教學課件相關推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1