【正文】 question that we39。s my full essay for the 39。positive or negative39。以小編幾十篇simon作文的閱讀量，大致總結(jié)了他最為習(xí)慣的行文結(jié)構(gòu)，通過對這個(gè)考官所喜歡的9分“模板”的解讀，希望大家能在自己的雅思寫作備考中，對寫作模板的使用能有一個(gè)新的認(rèn)識(shí)。Good in and take a you tell me your full name, please? What shall I call you?Can I see your identification please?Can you tell me where you are from?第一部分Now in this first part, I’d like to ask you some questions about ’s talk about…’d like to move on now to talk about …’s move on to the topic of …’s move on to the topic of …第二部分Now I’m going to give you a topic, and I’d like you to talk about it for one to two you talk, you’ll have one minute to think about what you’re going to can make some notes if you you understand?Here’s some paper and a pencil, for making notes, and here’s your topic......All right? Remember you have one to two minutes for this, so don’t worry if I stop ’ll tell you when the time is you start speaking now, please?......第三部分We’ve been talking about …… and I’d like to discuss one or two more generalquestions related to ，希望可以幫助到大家，更多雅思口語，雅思考試，雅思培訓(xùn)等相關(guān)信息盡在小馬過河雅思頻道，歡迎點(diǎn)擊咨詢。s case, can never be an outlier standing by the side of academic circle owing to its unique national condition第三篇：雅思口語考試考官常用套話雅思口語考試考官常用套話雅思口語考試中考官使用的指令語言是比較固定的，一般都是按照下面列的這個(gè)流程來進(jìn)行的。s generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, are others are , it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to bee a good sports person or both these views and give your own relative importance of natural talent and training is a frequent topic of discussion when people try to explain different levels of ability in, for example, sport, art or , education systems are based on the belief that all children can effectively be taught to acquire different skills, including those associated with sport, art or from our own school experience, we can find plenty of evidence to support the view that a child can acquire these skills with continuted teaching and guided , some people believe that innate talent is what differentiates a person who has been trained to play a sport or an intrusment, from those who bee good other words, there is more to the skill than to a learned technique, and this extra talent cannot be taught, no matter how good the teacher or how frequent a child personally think that some people do have talents that are probably inherited via their talents can give individuals a facility for certain skills that allow them to excel, while more hardwokring students never manage to reach a parable , as with all questions of nature versus nurture, they are not mutually musicians or artists and exceptional sports star have probably succeeded because of both good training and natural the natural talent, continuous training would be neither attractive nor productive, and without the training, the child would not learn hotw to exploit and develop their conclusion, I agree that any child can be taught particular skills, but to be really good in areas such as music, art or sport, then some natural talent is subjects and lesson contents are decided by the authorities such as the people argue that teachers should make the what extent do you agree or disagree?It has long been argued amid the munity: Which one counts more, authority or academy? Notwithstanding the fact that our current pedagogy is so much clinging to the central mittee, the educational system is in a blockbuster amount of outcry for the temporary system still embrace rationality? Or is it the ripe juncture to refurnish it out and out? I personally took a deep look in the showdown between authority and academy, the former arguably outweighs the is a pulsory course in all kinds of enrollment examinations as well as all levels of educational government, or a manderinchief to be vivid, needs to be held accountable for the stability of is by all means an almighty tool to incubate a behaving social development gaining momentum, a farsighted power base generally with a broader scope than the individuals, needs to build up particular majors specializing in fledgling domains involving cleaning energy, hightech innovation, interpretation, to name but a personnel in such fields are usually more fit into the being articulated above though, academyoriented teaching methodology is so far stillreputed for its own teachers gaining more says in selecting knowledge, the students will presumably be inculcated with a more objective perception of the authority barging in, the possibility of the impartiality being jeopardized is excluded for the mission of serving the regime is no longer under such circumstance can the intrinsic value of the subject be authentically and manifested to the thirsty learners in an untangled untarnished and pristine academic ambience is colossally demanding by numerous pundits for the sake of equity and sum up, there39。s is considered very important in is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or is very difficult to define, because it means so many different things to different some people link happiness to wealth and material success, others think it lies in emotions and loving personal others think that spiritual paths, rather than either the material world or relationships with people, are the only way to true people interpret happiness for themselves in so many diferent ways, it is difficult to give any definition that is true for , if there are different kinds of happiness for different individuals then the first step in achieving it would be to have a degree of person needs to know who he or she is before being able to know what it is that makes him or her course, factors such as loving relationships, good health, the skills to earn a living and a peaceful environment all contribute to our happiness this does not mean that people without these conditions can