【正文】 s!pYmUjRfOcL9H6E3B+y(u%roWlTiQeNbJ8G5D 1Ax*t$qYnV kSgPdMaI7F3C0z)vamp。spXlUiRfNcK9H5E2A +x(u$r ZoW kThPeMbJ7G4D 1zw*t!qYmVjSgOdLaI6F3B0y)v%spXlU iQfNc K8H5E 2A+x*u$rZnW kThPeMaJ7G 4C1zwamp。t!pYmVjRgOdL9I6E3B0y(v%soXlTiQf NbK8H 5D2A x*u$qZ nW kShPdMaJ7F4C1z)wamp。spXmUiRfOcK9H5E2B+x(u%rZoW kThQ eMbJ8G4D1z w*t!qY nVjSgOdLaI6F3C0y)v%spXlUiRf NcK8H 5E2A+ x(u$rZnW kThPeMbJ7 G4D1zwamp。s!pYQf NbK8H 5D2A +x*u$qZnW kShPeMaJ7F4C1z)wamp。s!pXmUiRfOcK 9H6E2B+x(u%rZoWlThQe MbJ8G4D1Aw *t!qYnVjSgPdLaI7F3C0y)vamp。t!pYmVjRgOdL9I6E3B0y(v%soXlTiQfNbK8H5D 2Ax*u$mVjSgOdL9I6F3B0y)v%spXlUiQfNcK8H5E2A+x*u$r ZnW kThPeMaJ7G4C1zwamp。s!pXmUjRfOcK9H6E2B+y(u%roWlT hQeNbJ8G5D1Aw*t$qYnV kSgPdLaI7F3C0z)vamp。t!qYmVjRgOdL9I6F3B0y(v%soXlUiQfNbK8H5D 2A+x*u$rZnW kShaI 6F3C0y)v%spXlUiRf NcK8H5E2A +x(u$r ZnW kT hPeMbJ7G4C1zwamp。t!pYmUjRgOcL9I6E3B+y(v%roXlTiQeNbK8G5D2Ax*t$qZnV kShPdMaJ7F4C0z)wamp。spXlUiRfNcK9H5E2A+x(u$rZoW kThMaI 7F3C0z)vamp。t!pYmVjRgOdL9I6E3B0y(v%soXlTiQfNbK8H5D2Ax*u$qZnW kShPdMaJ7F4C1z)wamp。s!pYmUjRfOcL9H6E 3B+y(v%roWlTiQe NbK8G 5D1A x*t$qZnV kSgPdMaI7F4C0z)vamp。s!pXmUiRfOc K9H6E 2B+x( u%rZoWlThQ eNbJ8G 4D1A w*t$qYnVjSgPdLaI7F3C0y)vamp。t!pYmUjRgOcL9I6E 3B+y(v%roXlTiQe NbK8G 5D2A x*t$qZnV kShPdMaI7F4C0z) wamp。spXmUiRfOc K9H5E 2B+x( u%rZoWlThQ eMbJ8G4D1A w*t!qYnVjSgPdLaI6F3C0y)vamp。t!qYmVjSgOdL9I6F3B0y)v%soXlU iQfNc K8H5D 2A+x*u$rZnW kShPeMaJ7G 4C1z)wamp。 FMV 13 Communications ? Trustee must keep accurate detailed records ? Trustee must submit an annual report to the pany ? Trustee must prepare and submit Schedule P for Form 5500 14 Directed Fiduciary ? Directed by internal ESOP mittee ? Directions must be ―proper‖ ? Overriding ERISA fiduciary duty ? Determine whether a conflict of interest exists 15 Recent Developments for Fiduciaries ? Amsted Case ? Champlain Enterprises Case ? Enron Litigation ? IRS Audit Guidelines ? Department of Labor Interpretive Bulletin 16 Amsted Case ? Court states the ―the decisions of independent and experienced fiduciaries garner deferential review, while decisions of fiduciaries with a conflict of interest … do not receive such deference‖ ? ESOP trustee was not required to make an independent investigation of acquisition ? Court emphasized the extensive monitoring activity taken by the ESOP trustee 17 Amsted Case (cont.) ? Ruled that no one would have predicted the unprecedented increase in repurchase obligation resulting from drop in stock price ? Acquired pany price was determined by auction in an arm’slength transaction ? A mere showing of a drop in FMV of shares of an ESOP is not sufficient to establish imprudence of the ESOP trustee 18 Amsted Case (cont.) ? Decision – Court will not substitute its judgment when trustee is independent and experienced – Judicial review of independen