【導(dǎo)讀】論文介紹了魯濱遜的命運(yùn)，及他的選擇和最后命運(yùn)給我們的教訓(xùn)。它描述了魯濱遜不顧父母。的勸阻而絕然的離家出海，盡管他的父母給他留下了一筆可觀的財產(chǎn)。他想要的是自由，他。自己創(chuàng)造的生活。當(dāng)他成功的離家而出海后，遇到了他之前所想象不到的災(zāi)難,但他還是決。定繼續(xù)航海，這就導(dǎo)致了他后來漂流到一個孤島上，幸運(yùn)的是他最后逃離了那個可怕的地方，并開始了他新的生活。從這里我們就可以知道他是一個頑固同時也很堅定的人。定并為自己的選擇負(fù)責(zé)。

　　

【正文】 , though she was still a famous somebody, the judgment of people to her was different. If we say the loyalty changed the fate of Danna, then this was the inevitable result she fought against her fate from a pure girl to a treasonable queen. The behave and dressing of Danna were different gradually from the several rules of the loyalty, so it was normal for her to be blamed. In the loyal that was famous for their conservation, the mon and normal behavior in her eyes can not be understood. For example, she liked to stand beside the playground to whoop and clap for her children when they were playing football there, and bought clothes for her children in the flesh in the clothes shop, offered absolute different education to her children, aiming to let her children know the real world, the real life. All of these opposed to the tradition and rule of the loyalty. The loyalty could not bear the queen with so treasonable character and queen Danna could not accept the kinds of rule, when such rules lose its effect on Danna, she certainly left there. These were the life trace of queen Danna. A great person who can just be a good mother, but not a socalled queen. Finally, she insisted on her own personality and chose her own free life, but not the treasure in the British loyalty. This is a typical example for our point that character decides our life. D. The Example of Xiangyu All of the above are the frontal examples。 there still are some contrary examples. Some people can not form proper character, and leading to the sad life. Xiangyu was a headstrong and indecisive person, therefore, though he was brave and tenacious, and could be socalled hero, he is still a rude man, he was festinated to be failing for his character. Therefore, the fight between Chu and Han was actually the haggle of temperament. At the beginning and the middle of the fight between Chu and Han, Xiangyu was actually in the advantageous condition, but he failed finally. The failure could be due to his character to the most extent. In the war, though Liubang was a rascal, his character had a lot of advantage that others could not pare, he can accept the words of his court, and was good at using useful people, he also dared to achieve his aim at any price. Although Xiangyu was a hero, he has not the quality of leader that was his indecisive character. For example, he could help his soldier to bind their cuts, but he could not praise them. The morale of the troop could not be evoked, so they failed in the batter. Conclusion We can see the frontal and the contrary sides of people?s character from the above introduction。 we can also know the importance of our temperament in our daily lives and the petition. A frontal character could help us live easily in the world, while a contrary one just could increase our burden. Robinson Crusoe saved himself by working hard on the isolated island positively and did not design to the difficulties. So he lived a happy life after he was saved, he was the winner of his fate。 his character decided his fate finally. A wise person should master the theory well, and can be the winner of life, but some stupid men can not understand it, and can not mand it well, such people only can be the victim of the world. They can not catch up with others。 accordingly, they can not be admitted by people in the world. The popular people in the 21st are those who can master their character and fate. Acknowledgements I would like to take this opportunity to thank my tutor—Peng Xinyue , who offers me many valuable academic and constructive advices on posing this paper. His encouragement and help are worthy of high acknowledgement. I thanks for his pattient direct and guide. Moreover, my numerous thanks go to my dear friends and my lovely roommates, Liu wanxia, Zouyan, Wang Jinfeng, Yang Hongying, who spend a lot of time with me on my thesis. Finally, I would like to offer my sincere gratitude to those who spend their precious time in reading this thesis. Bibliography [1] Fan Cunzhong. History of English Literature . Sichuan People39。s Press， 1983. [2] Oxford Advanced Learner?s English Chinese Dictionary. Oxford University Press, 2021. [3] Wang Shouren. Selected Readings in British Literature . Higher Education Press， 2021. [4] 阿尼克斯特 . 英國文學(xué)史綱 [M]. 北京 : 人民文學(xué)出版社 , 1959. [5] 戴爾 ?卡耐基 . 成功的性格 [M]. 重慶 : 重慶出版社 , 2021. [6] 端木義萬 . 英美報刊閱讀教程 [M]. 北京 : 北京大學(xué)出版 , 2021. [7] 穆睿清 , 姚汝勤 . 外國文學(xué)參考資料 [M]. 北京 : 地質(zhì)出版社 , 1984. [8] 汪乾詳 , 劉英杰 . 中外名言佳句精選 [M]. 北京 : 金盾出版社 , 2021. [9] 王守仁 . 英國文學(xué)選讀 [M].北京 : 高等教育出版社 , 2021. [10] 王作良 , 祝玨 . 歐洲文化入門 [M]. 北京 : 外語教學(xué)與研究出版社 , 2021. [11] 張均 , 楊惠濱 . 性格與命運(yùn) [M]. 長春 : 時代文藝出版社 , 2021. Cultures in Nonverbal Communication 非言語交際文化 Abstract People usually rely on languages to municate, to express their thought or to transmit the information. But there exists another means to convey the information during human?s munication, that?s nonverbal munication, which is an ancient and convenient form. It is necessary to employ nonverbal munication to express vividly during information transmission and thought and feeling exchanging. People usually use different parts of the body to convey the message and exchange their ideas. This is so called nonverbal munication, which includes gestures, posture, facial expression, distance between speakers, clothes of municators and so on. Body language differs from culture to culture, therefore body language in different countries means differently. So it is necessary to understand the relationship between nonverbal munication and culture clearly in the crosscultural munication. In this paper, the writer analyzes certain types of body language, such as distance munications occurs, physical contact, eye contact, smile and laughter and so on。 and then explore application of body language, suc