外文文獻(xiàn)翻譯交通運(yùn)輸專(zhuān)業(yè)中英文對(duì)照-資料下載頁(yè)
2024-12-06 01:13本頁(yè)面
【導(dǎo)讀】號(hào)：1081501136外文出處：IEEE附件：；。通常會(huì)導(dǎo)致有關(guān)用戶(hù)選擇交通方式的不同假設(shè)。估影響運(yùn)輸服務(wù)的政策。運(yùn)輸方式被認(rèn)為是公共交通工具，包括輕型軌道交通（輕。軌）和公共汽車(chē)，加上私人轎車(chē)。在三步旅行者行為仿真模型中，使用了廣義運(yùn)輸。它提出各類(lèi)交通以及對(duì)居民的出行選擇和郊區(qū)住宅社區(qū)形態(tài)量化的建。議，并使用了源自于中國(guó)北京一個(gè)典型走廊的數(shù)據(jù)。由于人口爆炸和改造中心城市，許多郊區(qū)城鎮(zhèn)發(fā)展為住宅區(qū)，這些新發(fā)。本文利用西北地區(qū)的北京作為一個(gè)測(cè)試案例，分析了運(yùn)。輸服務(wù)的政策，主要是費(fèi)用和服務(wù)質(zhì)量，將影響整體運(yùn)輸系統(tǒng)與城市空間結(jié)構(gòu)。城走廊案件，特別是中國(guó)的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行比較。和高速公路，西北地區(qū)迅速郊區(qū)化。交通安全，自行車(chē)被盜的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，停放自行車(chē)的費(fèi)用以及維護(hù)費(fèi)用，個(gè)人安全。結(jié)果表明，這些低收入公民因現(xiàn)有運(yùn)輸服務(wù)的政策限制遷。此外，居民不斷投訴交通擁堵和相對(duì)高的收費(fèi)公路
【正文】 plus in the areawhere the cost of public transport can be significantly reduced by decreasing congestionbecause of the long travel distances involved Particularly if a substantial portion ofusers are captive to public transport. The results of scenario 2 show that more highine travelers have to abandon the plan of migrating to suburb mainly owing to theserious congestion on the condition of free use. Another deeply influenced group ismedium ine travelers who shift from public transport modes to car driving. Bus fare reduction and bus lines increase make many medium ine residents shiftto bus transport meanwhile the car users shift to light rail particularly those who travelfor short distances. Furthermore the research finds that an integrated policy of improvedpublic transport service and some private car disincentives is beneficial to improvesystem efficiency and suburb munity attractiveness. The integration consists of light rail and bus fare reduction service qualityimprovement and highway toll imposition. It should be pointed out that light rail hasbeen designed to increase transit rider ship by making public transport more attractive tousers and thus to reduce road congestion. According to the simulation result the lightrail and bus fare reduction and capacity increase makes this mode more attractive tothose low and medium ine travelers who are captive to bus mode before. The finaloute is that more people can migrant to the suburb from low to high ine course the public transport service improvement requires government subsidizationwhich is a worldwide phenomenon. The economic travel distance of each mode is almostnot affected by different transport service policies. Bus is used more by short distancetraveler while the medium and long distance muters prefer to light rail. On thecontrary car users are not sensitive to the travel distance as shown in figure 34. Theresult indicates that those low ine citizens are restricted from migrating to economichouses in suburb towns on account of existing transport service policies includingrelatively high fare of public transport and highway limited light rail capacity and buslines. Of course all transport modes have been affected to some degree by the numbersof persons working at home. Urban transportation is a major realm of government po1icy throughout the transport policies also will affect the urban form deeply especially duringsuburbanization. In Beijing many economic apartments have been constructed in suburbfor those low ine citizens. There are two major problems before the policy from the past exper.
研究報(bào)告相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1