【導(dǎo)讀】師的指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作及取得的成果。盡我所知，除文中特別加。而使用過的材料。對(duì)本研究提供過幫助和做出過貢獻(xiàn)的個(gè)人或集體，均已在文中作了明確的說明并表示了謝意。集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的作品成果。本人完全意識(shí)到本聲明的法律。結(jié)果由本人承擔(dān)。擇時(shí)復(fù)雜的內(nèi)心掙扎,同時(shí)也可以了解社會(huì)環(huán)境和人性對(duì)小說中南希雙重性格形成所造成的影響.黑暗的一面，而其中南希的形象更引人深思。從各方面對(duì)南希的性格進(jìn)行了全面的分析，指出南希善良的本性，但并沒剖析其性格復(fù)雜的原因。并引申出自己的觀點(diǎn)。3）在網(wǎng)上搜索有用信息，經(jīng)自己綜合整理展開論證。[6]胡曉華.《霧都孤兒》中的仁愛與暴虐[J]黑龍江：黑龍江農(nóng)墾師專學(xué)報(bào)編輯部，20xx.[7]劉精香.《霧都孤兒》中南希的形象剖析[J].武漢：中南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)編輯部，1999.[11]喬國(guó)強(qiáng).從《霧都孤兒》看狄更斯的反猶主義傾向[J].北京：外國(guó)文學(xué)研究出版社，20xx.

　　

【正文】 . Nancy is passionate and intelligent, While Sikes is a brutal professional burglar brought up in Fagin‘s gang .He treats Nancy with an odd bination of cruelty and grudging familiarity .His murder of Nancy is the most heinous of many crime that occur in the novel. After murdering Nancy, Sikes flees London, only to find that his conscience will not let him escape. The entire account of Sikes‘s flight is also among the most psychologically sophisticated passages in the novel. Up until this point, Sikes has been a pure villain .In his guilt, however, he bees realistically human. Pursued by his guilty conscience and an angry mob, he inadvertently hangs himself while trying to escape. Nancy‘s love for Sikes exemplifies the moral ambiguity of her character. As she herself points out to Rose, devotion to a man can be ―a fort and a pride ―under the right circumstances But for Nancy, such devotion is ―a new means of violence and suffering‖indeed, her relationship with Sikes leads her to criminal acts for his sake and eventually to her own demise .The same behavior, in different circumstances, can have very different consequences and moral significance. In much of Oliver Twist, morality and nobility are blackandwhite issues, but Nancy‘s character suggests that the boundary between virtue and vice is not always clearly drawn. 2 The Reason of Nancy’s Double Character England in the 1830s was rapidly undergoing a transformation from an agricultural, rural economy to an urban, industrial nation. In the extremely stratified English class structure, the highest social class belonged to the ―gentleman,‖ an aristocrat who did not have to work for his living. The growing middle class had achieved an economic influence equal to, if not greater than, that of the British aristocracy. Many members of the middle class were anxious to be differentiated from the lower classes, and one way to do so was to stigmatize the lower class as lazy goodfor –nothings. Victorian society interpreted economic success as a sign that God favored the honest, moral virtue of successful individual‘s efforts and, thus, interpreted the condition of poverty as a sign of the weakness of the poor individual. The poor were naturally destined for lives of degradation and desperation. Living in such a society, although Nancy hopes some difference will happen on her, the society is hard to make her dream e true. Social Environment’s Influence to Nancy’s Double Character Nancy has bee a child pickpocket from a very young age. It is hard to know her birth background from the novel. She may be a love child as Oliver. What makes her to seek ―help‖ from Fagin? When Oliver sees Fagin‘s act, he feels it is very interesting. In a younger age than Oliver, Nancy can‘t recognize what is virtue or evil. Both of them are subjected to the paternal authority of Fagin and are dependent upon him for their food and shelter. While such a family provides panionship and a means for survival, it is not ultimately nurturing or morally healthy. Although after writing Oliver Twist, Dickens denied that antisemitism had influenced his portrait of Fagin, the Jewish thief‘s characterization does seem to owe much to ethnic stereotypes .He is ugly, simpering, miserly and avaricious. Constant references to him as ―the Jew‖ seem to indicate that his negative traits are intimately connected to his ethnic identity. However, Fagin is more than a statement of ethnic prejudice. He is a richly drawn, resonant embodiment of terrifying villainy. At times, he seems like a child‘s distorted vision of pure evil .He is such a conniving career criminal, who takes in homeless children and trains them to pick pockets for him. He is also a buyer of other people‘s stolen goods .He rarely mits crimes himself preferring to employ others to mit them and often suffer legal retribution –in his place. Although Fagin claims to be in partnership with his associates protecting them in exchange for their loyalty, in the end, Fagin manipulates his associates, so that his own selfinterest is better served .He watches the people around him with special care and translates his information into power. A prime example of this strategy is his hope to use Nancy‘s possible love to control her through blackmail. Even more, after he knows the meeting, he reveals Nancy‘s betrayal to Sikes. But Fagin purposely does not tell Sikes that Nancy insisted that her associates not get into trouble .He describes her action in such a way as to inspire Sikes‘s murderous rage Having Nancy killed is at least as beneficial to Fagin as to Sikes, but Fagin is unwilling to make a risk of doing the deed himself. Instead he uses his knowledge about of Nancy and about Sikes character to manipulate Sikes into mitting the horrible crime. Nancy regrets her life of vice, but she refuses Rose‘s offer to help her change it. Nancy‘s love for Sikes is more crucial to her decision to return to her old life than any belief that she has strayed too far from the path of moral goodness. The different light in which society treats Nancy‘s and Rose‘s romantic attachments reveals the extent of its prejudices against the poor, it is considered a virtue when Rose is unconditionally faithful to a respectable young man like Harry Maylie. Yet when Nancy displays the same fidelity to a dreadful fellow like Sikes, it bees ―a new means of violence and suffering.‖ This contrast demonstrates that socioeconomic status has the power to color all aspects of an individual‘s life, even the private emotions of love and sentiment. In Oliver Twist, there is a relationship between clothing and identity. When Nancy tries to get information from police station, she disguises herself. The wears reveals key differences between the middle and lowe