【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】 yone but my close declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working had a normal social life with other men outside of the believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be was very unfortable with the idea and told him thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social , to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to incidents took place in his office or were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual conversations were very spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penions, thomas told me graphically of his own sexual i was extremely unfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his efforts to change the subject were rarely the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of educationor office for civil thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social , to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to incidents took place in his office or were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual conversations were very spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penions, thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.第三篇：演講稿開(kāi)場(chǎng)白演講稿開(kāi)場(chǎng)白演講稿開(kāi)場(chǎng)白【經(jīng)典演講稿開(kāi)場(chǎng)白】演講稿開(kāi)場(chǎng)白，從心理學(xué)原理看，思維與語(yǔ)言是緊密地聯(lián)系著的，演講稿開(kāi)場(chǎng)白語(yǔ)言所表達(dá)的是思維活動(dòng)的結(jié)果。如果思維不敏捷不清晰不嚴(yán)密，語(yǔ)言的表達(dá)也就不可能流暢清楚。一個(gè)思維遲鈍而又混亂的人，絕不可能口若懸河滔滔不絕而又條理清晰地表達(dá)自己的思想。因此，口才表述水平的提高，很大程度上取決于表述者思維素質(zhì)和能力的提高?！狙葜v開(kāi)場(chǎng)白的重要性】一段精彩的開(kāi)場(chǎng)白有三種作用。第一，吸引聽(tīng)眾的注意力，激發(fā)聽(tīng)眾的好奇心；第二，概述你演講的主要內(nèi)容；第三，向聽(tīng)眾闡明聽(tīng)你演講的必要性。俄國(guó)大文學(xué)家 高爾基說(shuō)：“最難的是開(kāi)場(chǎng)白，就是第一句話，如同在音樂(lè)上一樣，全曲的音調(diào)，都是安給予的。平常得好久去尋找。”高爾基的這段話包含兩層意思： 第一，演講的第一句話至關(guān)重要，他的作用同音樂(lè)的“定調(diào)”，規(guī)定著全曲 的基本面貌和基本風(fēng)格。第二，適當(dāng)?shù)牡谝痪湓捠遣荒敲慈菀渍业降?，它?長(zhǎng)期積累和苦心斟酌的結(jié)果。奧地利的樂(lè)團(tuán)指揮韋勒說(shuō)：“如同有“招眼萠東西一般，也有”招耳 的東西。首先，對(duì)于演講者而言，有決定意義的是要獲得聽(tīng)眾的好感，引起 他們的注意，開(kāi)場(chǎng)白就是溝通演講者和聽(tīng)眾之間的第一座橋梁”。這位音樂(lè) 家指出，演講者的開(kāi)場(chǎng)白必須“招耳”，即引起聽(tīng)眾的注意，獲得他們的好 感。瑞士作家溫克勒說(shuō)：“開(kāi)場(chǎng)白有兩項(xiàng)任務(wù)，一是建立說(shuō)者與聽(tīng)者之間的 感情；二是如字意所示，打開(kāi)場(chǎng)面，引入正題。”溫克勒也強(qiáng)調(diào)開(kāi)場(chǎng)白應(yīng)建 議說(shuō)者和聽(tīng)者之間的認(rèn)同情感，并為下面的演講作好準(zhǔn)備?！狙葜v開(kāi)場(chǎng)白的方式】演講者一開(kāi)始就提出一個(gè)或幾個(gè)出乎意料的問(wèn)題，觸發(fā)聽(tīng)眾神經(jīng)元的亢奮，能夠迅速地喚起聽(tīng)眾的興趣和注意力，縮短演講者與聽(tīng)眾的距離，并能加深聽(tīng)眾對(duì)問(wèn)題的記憶和理解。如: 1980年復(fù)旦大學(xué)舉辦的《青年與祖國(guó)》的演講比賽，當(dāng)時(shí)由于種種原因，會(huì)場(chǎng)嘈雜難靜，這時(shí)有位同學(xué)上臺(tái)，他剛講個(gè)開(kāi)頭，就立刻扭轉(zhuǎn)了混亂局面，緊緊抓住了觀眾的心。他說(shuō):“我想提個(gè)問(wèn)題?！迸_(tái)下聽(tīng)眾立即被他這種新奇的開(kāi)頭形式所吸引。他停頓了下，繼續(xù)說(shuō):“誰(shuí)能用一個(gè)字來(lái)概括青年和祖國(guó)的關(guān)系呢?”臺(tái)下聽(tīng)眾議論紛紛，情緒活躍。他立即引導(dǎo)說(shuō):“可以用‘根’字來(lái)概括這種關(guān)系。”“我們青年有一個(gè)共同的姓，就是‘中華’。有一個(gè)共同的名，就是‘根’?！腥A根’應(yīng)該是中國(guó)青年最自豪、最光榮的名字!”話音剛落，全場(chǎng)頓時(shí)掌聲雷動(dòng)。這樣的提問(wèn)開(kāi)頭，新穎別致，出人意料，讓人耳目一新，激起聽(tīng)眾濃厚的興趣。一位學(xué)生在講《走出誤區(qū)，實(shí)現(xiàn)價(jià)值》時(shí)這樣開(kāi)頭:“同學(xué)們，當(dāng)前我們大學(xué)生求職出現(xiàn)了前所未有的困難，原因是什么呢?是我們國(guó)家的人才太多了嗎?是我們學(xué)的東西過(guò)時(shí)了嗎?還是我們眼光不再符合社會(huì)需求了呢?面對(duì)這么多的問(wèn)題，我們這些即將走出校門的大學(xué)生又如何應(yīng)對(duì)這一現(xiàn)象呢?”一連串的問(wèn)題一下子緊緊抓住觀眾。對(duì)于提問(wèn)式開(kāi)頭應(yīng)注意:不能泛泛地為提問(wèn)而提問(wèn)，提問(wèn)的信息要與對(duì)象、場(chǎng)合相適應(yīng)，同時(shí)講究?jī)?nèi)容的合理性和確定性，要使聽(tīng)眾感到新鮮，出乎意料，能激發(fā)聽(tīng)眾積極思考，而且與后面闡述的問(wèn)題聯(lián)系緊密，能巧妙自然地引發(fā)出演講的主體內(nèi)容。演講者一開(kāi)始就講述新近發(fā)生的奇聞怪事、令人震驚的重大事件或生動(dòng)感人的故事，這種開(kāi)頭，由于故事具有情節(jié)生動(dòng)、內(nèi)容新奇等特征，容易贏得聽(tīng)眾的關(guān)注，并能造成懸念，激起聽(tīng)眾的興趣。如:《救救孩子》的演講，是這樣開(kāi)頭的:去年5月24日的《新民晚報(bào)》，披露這樣一個(gè)事實(shí):一個(gè)四年級(jí)的小學(xué)生，每天要帶父母親手剝光了殼的雞蛋到學(xué)校吃。有一次，父母忘了給雞蛋剝殼，差點(diǎn)憋壞了孩子，他對(duì)著雞蛋左瞅瞅，右看看，不知如何下口。結(jié)果只好原蛋帶回。母親問(wèn)他怎么不吃雞蛋，回答很簡(jiǎn)單:沒(méi)有縫，叫我怎么吃!通過(guò)這個(gè)小故事的開(kāi)頭，引發(fā)了整個(gè)社會(huì)、家庭關(guān)注《救救孩子》的演講。然后，作者提出所有的老師、所有的家長(zhǎng)，是否也應(yīng)該考慮一下我們的學(xué)