【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 know that environment protection needhightechnology, Hightech personnel, and science all need a lot ofmoney, and money is created by want to ask my fellow debater that canwe protect our environment well without strong economy strength自由辯論正方一辯：請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們經(jīng)濟發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？Excuse me, my fellow the primitive society, human ancestor`senvironmental protection work is good, but to them Economic developmentis very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, shouldwe return to this kind of life according to your meaning?反方一辯：人類祖先確實需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請問你怎么看？Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longerguaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the oute of the economicdevelopment, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it?正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經(jīng)濟發(fā)展就一定會破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對方所說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟是科學研究的基礎(chǔ)。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment。second, the situation you said is only rare。third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not economy is the foundation of scientific ：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之間？But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機器可以運作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會有辦法彌補，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之處？Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people39。s living the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant ：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補。為什么要先污染后治理？為什么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經(jīng)濟建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治理是錯的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won39。t ：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴重污染了環(huán)境，而我方堅信是可以挽救的。而且事實上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經(jīng)濟的同時，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護。I can not but say that we are really is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted theenvironment seriously, but we believed that is can be in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the ：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no time goes on, it will still be a miserable we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening ：對方辯友請從事實出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展必然會付出代價，我們已經(jīng)在努力使代價降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, theeconomic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a ：降低應(yīng)該有個標準吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的，等到他揭示這個標準時，只怕為時已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too 正方四辯：首先，我是一個支持環(huán)保的人，擁有一個健康的生態(tài)環(huán)境是可持續(xù)發(fā)展得以進行的前提。但是，如果一味的保護環(huán)境，而忽視經(jīng)濟發(fā)展，那么對于經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展不利，對于人們生活水平的提高也同樣不利。同時，我也必須強調(diào)，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展絕對不是破壞環(huán)境，那樣的發(fā)展，也是違背自然規(guī)律的。在發(fā)展經(jīng)濟的同時，我們要兼顧治理環(huán)境，才是當今可持續(xù)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟的理念。First, I am a supporter of environmental a healthyecological environment is the premise of the sustainable , if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economicdevelopment, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living the same time, I must stress that theeconomic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is theconcept of sustainable economic ：過去的發(fā)展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，結(jié)果呢，環(huán)境問題突出，局部地區(qū)已經(jīng)到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處于一種被動的境地。因此，必須從源頭開始防止污染，也就是發(fā)展過程首先考慮對環(huán)境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望在將來解決環(huán)境問題。The past development road is a managementafterpollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival。Furthermore,managementafterpollution pattern not only costs higher, but also isinefficient, sometimes in a passive , we must start to prevent pollution from the source, that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.第四篇：經(jīng)濟發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護英文辯論賽經(jīng)濟發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護英文辯論賽Which should receive priority in china, economic growth or environmental protection？ Theoretical clich233。正方一辯：從人類發(fā)展的終極目標看，我們要徹底地解決環(huán)境問題，必須要標本 兼治。要治本，必須優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟，從根本上優(yōu)化經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)堵住產(chǎn)生環(huán)境問 題的源頭，要治標，同樣要優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟，為解決眼前的環(huán)境問題提供技術(shù)、資金等支持，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發(fā)展提供環(huán)境保障。Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental