【文章內(nèi)容簡介】
則,管好班子,帶好隊伍,確保不發(fā)生違法違紀(jì)事件。努力打造風(fēng)清氣正的教師隊伍。大力開展強(qiáng)師德、正師風(fēng)、樹形象教育活動,引導(dǎo)教師以德立身、以德育人、爭做學(xué)生表率。依法治教、廉潔從教,堅決抵制“三亂”,以“零容忍”的態(tài)度管好自己和親屬。堅決不做有損教師隊伍形象的事,塑造教育系統(tǒng)的正氣形象。我本人鄭重表態(tài):自覺接受監(jiān)督,從現(xiàn)在做起,從自身做起,從點(diǎn)滴做起,與大家一起共同筑牢拒腐防變的思想道德防線,真正無愧于組織的囑托,無愧于群眾的期望,無愧于自己的奮斗,無愧于家人的付出, 以優(yōu)良的作風(fēng)和過硬的實(shí)績推進(jìn)全縣教育事業(yè)又好又快發(fā)展,向全縣百萬人民交上一份滿意的答卷!謝謝!第四篇:在黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè)會議上的發(fā)言提綱在黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè)會議上的發(fā)言提綱黨內(nèi)監(jiān)督是黨依照黨章和黨內(nèi)其他規(guī)章制度在組織內(nèi)部開展的有序的監(jiān)察、督促活動,其實(shí)質(zhì)是從人民的利益出發(fā),按照從嚴(yán)治黨的要求,進(jìn)行自我約束和自我完善。這是我們黨執(zhí)政后永遠(yuǎn)立于不敗之地的重要保證。恩格斯曾經(jīng)指出:無產(chǎn)階級奪取政權(quán)以后,必須采取堅決措施,防止自己的工作人員“去追求升官發(fā)財”。延安時期,毛澤東同志在回答民主人士黃炎培先生提出的中國共產(chǎn)黨如何跳出歷代統(tǒng)治者由興到衰乃至滅亡的“周期率”問題時,就強(qiáng)調(diào)民主監(jiān)督是國家政權(quán)穩(wěn)固的根基,是跳出歷史“周期率”的新路。鄧小平同志在實(shí)踐中創(chuàng)造性地運(yùn)用和發(fā)展了馬克思主義關(guān)于黨的監(jiān)督理論。早在50年代,他就發(fā)表了關(guān)于“共產(chǎn)黨要接受監(jiān)督”的重要論述。目前,全國上下紛紛掀起就學(xué)習(xí)貫徹中共中央頒布的《建立健全教育、制度、監(jiān)督并重的懲治和預(yù)防腐敗體系實(shí)施綱要》(以下簡稱《實(shí)施綱要》),《大理日報》先后刊發(fā)了中共大理州委書記顧伯平同志題為《標(biāo)本兼治綜合治理懲防并舉注重預(yù)防開創(chuàng)全州黨風(fēng)廉政和反腐敗工作新局面》和州委副書記、州長趙立雄同志題為《認(rèn)真學(xué)習(xí)貫徹向黨員群眾“亮底”,接受群眾的批評幫助。本文章共2頁,當(dāng)前在第2頁上一頁[1][2]第五篇:怎么在會議上發(fā)言怎么在會議上發(fā)言(原文及譯文)How to make ments in meetingsAlmost everyone likes to express him/ look at the popularity of ments and/or criticism of what others say is a close scholastic endeavors, One can write “l(fā)etters to the editor” to ment on published journal even have “discussion” section following each article devoted to this frequently, audience in a meeting are given Qamp。A time following the presentation of each paper in a session to let people ment on the from legitimate inquiries, making a ment serves other purposes:1It lets the reader to vent his/her anger or it shows support for the opinion form is most prevalent in anonymous ments for blog won39。t dwell on helps to illustrate further the content of the presentation for other reader and the audience3Show off the knowledge and expertise of the mentator.2 and 3 are legitimate goals and represent a large percentages of all ments but are rather difficult to carry carelessly, it backfires on the person making the ments and leavesa bad impression of him or her on the in many meetings, I continuously see people make such foolish remarks with the hope that