畢業(yè)論文心得分享我的投稿經(jīng)歷-酸甜苦辣(編輯修改稿)
2025-08-31 17:31 本頁(yè)面
【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】 ayalso wish to revise your manuscript so that the new and significantphysics is better highlighted. In addition, please expand it intoa regular article format (. by adding section headings) and weencourage you to add any material our readership may benefit fromsince no length limit applies.We will hold your manuscript in our office until we receive yourresponse.Yours sincerely,當(dāng)時(shí)覺(jué)得編輯這么說(shuō)了，感覺(jué)還是挺有希望的，于是快馬加鞭修改，之后就投出去了。大概歷時(shí)三個(gè)月收到審稿意見(jiàn)。判決結(jié)果－拒！有一次敗了！當(dāng)時(shí)心情十分沮喪。審稿意見(jiàn)如下：Dear Dr. ,The above manuscript has been reviewed by two of our referees.Comments from the reports are enclosed.We regret that in view of these ments we cannot accept the paperfor publication in the Physical Review.Yours sincerely,Assistant EditorPhysical Review BEmail: prb@Fax: 6315914141Physics spotlighting exceptional research: PRL Celebrates 50 Years: PRB Editors39。 Suggestions: Report of the First Referee /The paper aims at the numerical solution of the set of Schroedingerand Poisson equations for a splitgate structure and subsequentapplication of the results to calculation of quantizedacoustoelectric current.The paper is sound and well written. However, in my view, it does notcontain enough new physics to warrant its publication in the PhysicalReview. Since the work seems to be useful to people involved inoptimizing standards of electrical current I remend to resubmit thepaper to a journal more specialized on applications, such as theJournal of Applied Physics.Report of the Second Referee /The subject of the paper is an interesting one, although the focus ofthe munity has shifted away from it in the meantime. Neverthelessthe paper would be worth publishing if it gave better evidence in theinteresting electron transport mechanism prevailing in this effect.Specifically the authors present numerical results for the potentialin a SAW driven splitgate induced small channel. They claimin the abstract that the potential barrier heights calculatedin the closedchannelregime agree well with the experiment weperformed. To my understanding they (implicitly) claim that theirnumerical method provides better understanding of the SETSAW effectand that it should allow for a better design of
環(huán)評(píng)公示相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1