【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】
t al, 2001, Returns to Schooling in less developed Countries: New evidence form Zambia, Economic development and cultural change, 49,2: 365394.(1)Explain the source of selective bias if simply use Mincer Model to estimate return to Education in Zambia (and other LDCs). Is this concern as important as such in DCs? Why? (2)What’s the authors’ strategy to eliminate selective bias? Do you find the variables the authors use to capture the personal characteristics convincing?(3)How e the discrepancies between the coefficients of the same variables on the left part and the right part of table 5? (4)What are the meanings of the coefficients in table 6? Is table 6 consistent with table 5? Take urban males in formal sector as an example to give detailed explanation. 9. Urban amp。 RuralTaylor, E., et al, Migration and Ines in Source Communities: A New Economics of Migration Perspective from China, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Oct 2003。 52, 1: 75101.(1)農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)力外遷后,如果農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)出未下降,是否說(shuō)明外遷的勞動(dòng)力在農(nóng)業(yè)中邊際產(chǎn)出為0?為什么?從表2看,有勞動(dòng)力外遷的家庭人均收入要低于無(wú)勞動(dòng)力外遷的家庭,這是否足以說(shuō)明勞動(dòng)力外遷對(duì)家庭收入來(lái)源有著不利影響?(2)按照NELM,一個(gè)從不完善市場(chǎng)角度來(lái)考察勞動(dòng)力遷移的理論,農(nóng)村家庭為什么會(huì)作出讓勞動(dòng)力外遷的決策?假如市場(chǎng)是完善的,家庭的決策會(huì)有什么不同?為什么?在什么條件下,勞動(dòng)力外遷會(huì)使家庭收入增加?(3)在表4中,為什么用遷移人數(shù)的估計(jì)值(predicted)而不是實(shí)際值來(lái)做解釋變量?該值是怎樣估計(jì)出來(lái)的?你認(rèn)為這種估計(jì)方法有說(shuō)服力嗎?從表4看,外遷勞動(dòng)力對(duì)于來(lái)自糧食種植的收入(Yc)有著怎樣的影響?(4)表5的結(jié)果是否與NELM理論相一致?解釋。表5和表6的結(jié)果矛盾嗎?為什么?(5)根據(jù)本文的研究,政府對(duì)農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)力外遷應(yīng)采取什么政策?10. LandAbhijit V Banerjee。 Paul