偽造居民身份證罪論文：考試作弊行為的刑法規(guī)制探討(編輯修改稿)
2025-07-17 04:29 本頁面
【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 e also developed a number of examination rules, introduced penalties for cheating. So, for exam cheating handling general administrative punishment enough, still need to use criminal law to punish them? Whether cheating behavior is necessary to punish, if it has, for what type, the nature of the test can be used? In the use of criminal penalties in the process, the use of punishment which the crime? These issues are worthy of our thought and thesis from the English four cheating cases lead to criminal punishment for cheating thinking, practice for the punishment in such cases to the crime of false identity cards to their conviction and sentencing. However, we clearly see that the means of behavior is punished, not the essence of cheating behavior the behavior of cheating in exams. The reason is that Chinese current legislation does not give for cheating how to deal with criminal punishment, the case is forged identity cards for their acts of their punishment. In this paper, cheating crime or to explore, through the use of parison, the inductive me
環(huán)評公示相關推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1