【正文】 當(dāng)時(shí)孫悟空是大師兄、是上司、是大師兄，獨(dú)斷專行、飛揚(yáng)跋扈是出了名的，玉皇大帝他也不怕，就是師傅，如果不是有那個(gè)金箍咒，他怎么可能把一個(gè)肉體凡胎的唐朝和尚放在眼里。有了電腦，人們不再用人腦去思考一些東西，因?yàn)橹灰秒娔X就能辦到；有了汽車，人們不再習(xí)慣走路散步，取而代之的是開車兜風(fēng)；有了洗碗機(jī)，人們不再用手去洗碗，也許有一天人類會(huì)忘記怎樣洗碗。對(duì)方辯友身為祖國的花朵面對(duì)這樣的真知灼見，至今未能幡然醒悟，真是讓我痛心疾首啊！所以我方堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為：人性本惡。我方對(duì)于正方辯友提出的觀點(diǎn)深表懷疑。而實(shí)際上，供電企業(yè)為了維護(hù)自身的權(quán)益，卻要求用電客戶補(bǔ)交電費(fèi)，這樣的維權(quán)能保障供、用電雙方的合法權(quán)益嗎？電力是特殊的商品已是不爭的事實(shí)，居民掏錢買電、供電公司收費(fèi)后向居民供應(yīng)電力，并提供一系列的相關(guān)服務(wù)。此外社會(huì)學(xué)，管理心理學(xué)，生物學(xué)，哲學(xué)等方面的研究都眾所皆知了。一個(gè)企業(yè)要發(fā)展要進(jìn)步，那必須要一群管的住的員工，而孫悟空雖然本領(lǐng)很高但是他不服從管理，在三打白骨精，全滅強(qiáng)盜土匪等章節(jié)都能看出。第五篇：英語辯論賽反方一辯開場詞 my fellow afternoon ladies and are glad that the definition we made about corpse donation is similar with fellow debaters’.However, I can’t agree with debaters’ insist that upon death, each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use, or for organ to this topic, what is“should be given”? Is it a forced obligation? Donation has the firstly basic principle is what is the voluntary principle? It refers to the dead and his family donate the corpse with lack of voluntary,it is not the “donation” but followings are the reasons for our of all, we approval that corpse donation can really meet the needs of scientific use or organ for part people who require organ to transplant to save their lives, but how much is this part? In China,the current medical system is not perfect, and cost of the trans