【正文】 difference is slight. Furthermore,these groups, upon analysis, disclose tendencies which give additional information on the prevalence of some of the trends monly thought of as characteristic of the inferiority plex. The perfectionist group reveals a particularly interesting condition Its failure (except in the case of women, and when it occurs to a marked degree) to give significant indices of diagnostic value is due, not to the fact that the upper quarter of the distribution does not tend to possess the traits prising this class, but that the lower quarter tends to possess them also. The difference between the parison groups, therefore, is relatively slight. Possibly the traits which constitute this group— ., is conscientious。 一般來說，趨勢是在于應用，而不是變態(tài)心理問題的貢獻。這樣做，一個無論是正面還是負面的判斷都 可能傾向于導致一個錯誤的結(jié)果。 在試圖消除對錯誤的一些更明顯的來源的情況下，采取了以下措施： ，在課堂上用空白文本，沒有自卑感參考，因此沒有無知的爭論點和推測，也沒有特定的偏見。 首先，它表明，這成功抵御了規(guī)模化的傾向，常常會遇到。顯然，自卑感不是任何個人證 明有或沒有的，但他擁有一個或大或小的程度。首先，原來的 137個項目和兩個分別以每一年中，收視率，計算為規(guī)模的五個步驟（ 0 + + +） 。但這些可能的例外可以追溯到文獻，具有自卑感的特點。結(jié)果并不總是相同的，男人和婦女，自己和聯(lián)營公司的評級。這種情況下，或其他相關情況，具有各種特色，可分類如下： ；表現(xiàn)出臉紅，尷尬，參考妄想，一種傾向，關心自己的感受，想法，計劃，動機。如果規(guī)模中的性狀分別納入這些一般性的標題，如果診斷值 B平均指數(shù)為每個組確定，根據(jù)實證結(jié)果將有可能看到自卑的各種復雜的特點。顯然他們的存在為輕度的診斷出一些特點是不尋常的做了鋪墊。完美主義小組發(fā)現(xiàn)一個特別有趣的條件，它的失敗（除了婦女的情況，當它發(fā)生了顯著的程度），以顯著的診斷價值指數(shù)與四分之一的分配往往不具有的特點是因為不是一個事實，但較低的四分之一往往也擁有這些。但其他人不能提供的銷售，可能是因為他們似乎不可取的，從而掩蓋個體差異。這里的數(shù)據(jù)是相當復雜的，但一般來說，這個排名代表了常規(guī)的態(tài)度而不是真正的個人反應。 可能是此組的特征構(gòu)成，例如，“是認真的，將會太多，而不是太少”，“仔細注意細節(jié)”等被認為是可取的，而且往往由于這個原因被沒有自卑感困擾的個人挪用。但是，如果這個 詞是指作為性狀的問題在更大程度比一般組中發(fā)現(xiàn)藏有定量分析，可確定它的存在后，才建立了群體規(guī)范和條件，只有當它超出集團平均顯著水平的程度才將被視為自卑感。下表顯示了幾點意見。 3.“指導原則” ； 一個理想或野心的強烈愿望，代表斷言，區(qū)分自我，表達白日夢，崇高的理想本身，未來的生活的 趨勢。在這個意義上，他們可能被視為構(gòu)成了一個復雜的概念實證自卑的理由。一些研究已經(jīng)接受了作為重大項目的主題，如果它是揭示了不同的標準，如錯誤或錯誤的差別可能很大，有些人如果是兩個或三個按照不同時代的標準有可能錯誤。第三，對不同方向，指示其金額相對于錯誤的差異決定的。 第二點是自卑，按圖表顯示，一般輪廓對應在心理學文獻中自卑感所述。但事實上，這并不意味著所有都不存在一定程度的損害 。坦誠和獨立被作為評分要求 ,包括口語和書面指示。在 列，其對面的存在，以在很小的程度計算，以及在 列，其對面的存在是以一個顯著的程度。他們建議，對異常心理的概念，很多優(yōu)秀的案例是它們?nèi)狈?jīng)驗的證明，雖然精辟，但是他們很少被提交統(tǒng)計分析，將他們 “ 無私 ” 的拿出來作為適用性的證據(jù)。s self or to one39。 disadvantages due to race, family, economic condition。 the feeling that one is unappreciated, unjustly treated, that the world in general fails to appreciate and reward merit, and to recognize wrongdoing. of nerve。 ratings. Nevertheless they indicate that the traits theoretically constituting an inferiority plex form a consistent set of traits in the sense that any one of them does what the list as a whole does in distinguishing between the groups at the extremes of the distribution,— a fact which is in harmony with the supposition that the traits, taken together, constitute a fairly definite general attitude or tendency to reaction. In this sense, they may be regarded as constituting an empirical justification of the concept of the inferiority plex. However, it is a justification only in the sense indicated. Since there was no outside criterion against which the scale could be checked, there is, strictly speaking, no justification for saying that it measures the inferiority plex, or that the groups pared represent contrasting degrees of that condition. All that can be said is that the items on the scale form a consistent set of traits, capable of revealing characteristic differences between the extremes of the distribution。 on the other hand, no one was rated, either by himself or his associates,as possessing none of them. Apparently the inferiority plex is not something which an individual either possesses or lacks, but which he possesses to a greater or smaller extent. This situation is entirely in accord with the assumption that normal and abnormal conditions are continuous. II. The second point is that the inferiority plex, as revealed by the ratings, corresponded in general outline to the inferiority plex as described in the psychological literature. That is, the traits given by psychiatrists as characterizing this condition,tended to appear more frequently in individuals who (according to the measure employed) were characterized by the inferiority plex, than in those not so characterized. This tendency appeared though the subjects had no way of knowing which traits belonged together theoretically or even that there was any such question involved. This fact was brought out by regarding the upper and lower quarters of the distribution as representing, respectively, the highest and lowest degrees of the inferiority plex present in the group studied, and by paring them to see whether the upper group was rated as possessing the traits theoretically characteristic of the inferiority plex to a significantly greater degree than the lower. The rank order which determined the selection of these groups was based on self and associates39。 and if so, what characteristies does it possess ? GENERAL PLAN OF THE STUDY The general plan of the study was as follows. It began by accepting the concept of the i