【正文】
erformances in two age groups 4535N =G r o u pK2K1Scores on word learning403020100 1 070Syntheses ? Between phonological capacity and word learning ?On individual subjects G r o u pIVI I IIIIMean scores on word learning322824201612840 ?Between phonological capacity and word learning ?On word items S o u n d c a te g o r yIVI I IIIIMean scores on word learning4 . 0 03 . 0 02 . 0 01 . 0 00 . 0 01 . 4 71 . 6 01 . 5 91 . 6 8 S o u n d c a t e g o r yIVII IIIIMean scores on word learning4 .0 03 .0 02 .0 01 .0 00 .0 01 .7 61 .8 01 .1 51 .6 3The result of original design The reputed result ? Correlational analyses V a ri a bl e s 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 01. W ord l e a rni ng .30* * .25* .34* * .15 .04 .50* * .42* * 02. N onw ords re pe t i t i on .25* .18 .24* .20 .39* * .33* * 03. P honol og i c a l c a pa c i t y .74* * .93* * .71* * .32* * .42* * 04. N e w w ord di s c ri m i na t i on .43* * . 37* * .26* .25* * 05. N e w w ord pr oduc t i on .74* * .29* .42* * 06. P roduc t i on pi c t ure na m i ng .16 .32* * 07. P P V T R .64* * 08. A g e ? A stepwise multiple regression Conclusion 1) The ability to prehend the target labels is plays a major role in the word learning process, while the abili