城市規(guī)劃專業(yè)畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)外文翻譯-文庫吧在線文庫
【正文】 orea. Journal of the JLA. 68(5):8598132 [3]中國城市規(guī)畫 設(shè)計(jì) 研究院 (2020).城市規(guī)畫資料集 1, 建設(shè)工業(yè) 出版社 [4] 胡 序 威 . 我 國 區(qū) 域 規(guī) 劃 的 發(fā) 展 態(tài) 勢 與 面 臨 問 題 16:39) [5] 中國財(cái)富的聚寶盆 . 長三角的國 家使命 . bd/qyyb/ 一 (20200615 16:09) [6]國土 規(guī)劃 、區(qū)域 規(guī)劃 、城市 規(guī)劃 . ?？臻g規(guī)劃不包括幾乎非注冊會計(jì)師地區(qū)，因此 從多方向角度的改善 全面的環(huán)境或景觀可能是困難的。 4 Conclusions (1)Acts and petent ministries related national territory plan: One may say that Japan and China have similar planning system, as .showing () when there is plural acts that support national territory plan, the relation between plans and a role of each ministry should be made clear. (2)Vertical relation of plans: China and Korea has paratively clear vertical relation between plans because they both have strong nature to transmit planning policy from top to bottom. However, an each plan of China was strictly bound to administrative unit and in Japan the role of semiwide area planning is relatively weak. In the future, setting widearea planning beyond single administrative unit would be possible to connect effectively the higher plans and the lower plans,according to economic, cultural and natural conditions. (3)Spatial area covered by national territory plan: In Japan the area covered by a certain prehensive plan is actually limited to city planning area (CPA). Spatial planning does not cover almost nonCPA area。這兩個計(jì)劃所提供的行為完全分擔(dān)責(zé)任。 另外， 每一個字母的方式行為 是受到規(guī)定的 ， VCP必須 調(diào)整自己 CP和 CLUP，并且 CF 要調(diào)整自己的 CLUP 和 RP，但實(shí)際上 錯誤經(jīng)常發(fā)生 ，因?yàn)榻?jīng)常籌劃困難調(diào)整各部委之間和它們之間的共享計(jì)劃的作用尚不清楚。主管部門分為國土資源部、建設(shè)部、國家發(fā)展和改革委員會。 LUMP 對 這個地區(qū) 的分類支持 主管部門和行為 ,并 單獨(dú)應(yīng)用于各區(qū)域 計(jì)劃中 。 plans and in nonurban areas there is no prehensive plan that unifies the related plans (Fig. 1) and a frame/role of regional planning is relatively weak. 一 、日本的國土規(guī)劃系統(tǒng) 綜合國家發(fā)展行動 (1950 年 )、土地利用總體規(guī)劃 (1974 年 )和城市規(guī)劃條例(1968)都 支持日本主要的空間規(guī)劃 (表 1)。s official websites of each country to clarify the purposes of this study. And we classified each country39。 China。Spatial Planning System of National Territory in Japan，China and Korea 日本、中國和韓國 的國土空間規(guī)劃體系 Kyungrock YE, Junhua ZHANG, Takeshi KINOSHITA, Xingyan WANG Abstract: This study conducted the national territory planning system of Japan, China and Korea, on a premise to discuss possibility of integrated spatial planning of Eastern Asia. The purpose of this study is to arrange major spatial plans of three countries according to classification of urban and nonurban area, and to clarifying role of each spatial plan.。 Japan。 This study was done to clarify the similarities and differences of national territory planning system of Japan, China and Korea as a first step to discuss on the subjects and possibilities of prehensive Eastern Asian spatial planning. Until now the national territory planning system of Japan and Korea have already been studied , but the parative study between three countries including China from the viewpoint of spatial planning has never seen before. We used mainly related literatures on planning system and government39。, the other nonurban area is depended on other related acts (). The area classification by LUMP supports petent ministries and acts, and separate plans are applied to each area. In other words, one may say that the Japanese national territory planning stresses the urban areas39。因此 ,市區(qū)主要由三 個 行為 控制 ,而 其他的非 市 區(qū)是依靠其它相關(guān)的行為。
公司管理相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1