【正文】 t on a oneway flow of information from the brain sciences to education but instead on a continuing and bidirectional exchange of expertise and understandings among those involved in relatively direct studies of the brain and educational practitioners, who have important additional understandings of the brain that derive from their experiences as than throwing out the baby with the bath water, it makes sense to reorient discussions of brain and education in ways that correct contemporary understandings of the limitations of the earlier include:Involve in discussions of brain and education the widest possible array of perspectives, including both research scientists representing all relevant disciplines and educational practitioners to see themselves as well as brain scientists, who have unique contributions to make to the body of observations on brain and education and can/should play a role in helping to define future research seriously the possibility that with improved understandings of the brain will e not only improvements in education as currently practiced and understood but also new conceptions of the nature of education itself(cf Parallel changes in thinking about the brain and about education).That movements in these directions are already beginning to occur is a positive hope is that this sketch and related materials on Serendip, including Brain and Education Resources and a Brain and Education online forum, will both support further developments along these lines and encourage additional people to bee sense is that many of the most significant challenges we face today as human beings will be resolved only by new cultural understandings, and that there is no way to bring those about other than through a reinvigorated educational process, one to which I believe improved understandings of the brain can valuably science itself, and the human culture of which it is a part, would benefit from a story of science that encourages wider engagement with and participation in the processes of scientific a story, based on a close analysis of scientific method, is presented is the story of science as story telling and story story of science as story suggests that science can and should serve three distinctive functions for humanity: providing stories that may increase(but never guarantee)human wellbeing, serving as a supportive nexus for human exploration and story telling in general, and exemplifying a mitment to skepticism and a resulting openended and continuing exploration of what might yet practical considerations that would further the development and acceptance of such a story of science as a widely shared nexus ofhuman activity are 的 Culture Smart or Science Intelligent?(CCTV2009演講題目)5月13日，中國中央電視臺和外語教學(xué)與研究出版社聯(lián)合舉辦的2009“CCTV杯”全國英語演講大賽籌備會在北京召開。我們需要文化的智慧是因為一方面為科學(xué)技術(shù)提供精神動力；另一方面防止科學(xué)技術(shù)向極端化方向發(fā)展。正因為了有了現(xiàn)代科學(xué)技術(shù)的進步，特別是智能化的發(fā)展，如機器人、無人駕駛技術(shù)、數(shù)字平臺等為人類的生產(chǎn)、生活提供了極大的方便，推動著社會的進步。As is known to us all that our contemporary lives and the society in current are undergoing profound changes with the promoting development of science and , have we realized the estrange and departure of our culture against the background on which the positive achievements have been brought by science and course should we take in culture smart and science intelligence as the issue on social development is concerned in the process of ultrahighspeeded urbanization? My viewpoint is clear anfirm, that is the cultue ，隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的大力發(fā)展，我們的社會，我們的生活正在正在發(fā)生著日新月異的變化，然而我們在看到科學(xué)技術(shù)所帶來的積極成果的同時，我們是否意識到文化的遠離？在這個急速都市化的時代，我們的社會到底怎樣發(fā)展，是靠文化的智慧還是科學(xué)技術(shù)的智能化？我的觀點是明確的，我們要文化的智慧。The ultrahigh speed of the development of contemporary science and technology contributes no efforts on science and technology itself, but the ideological motivation and the promotion spurred by the ideological power offerd by culture Poopper once said, the elimination of culture leads to the disappearance of is obviously that if the promotion effect had been omitted, the science and technology could have been ，并不在于科學(xué)技術(shù)的本身，而是因為文化為科技提供了強大的精神動力，文化智慧的強大精神力量的推動作用。所以，我們只有立足于文化的智慧，才能更有利于科技正確的發(fā)展和人類社會的不斷進步，繁榮與和平。第一階段勝出的前60名選手進入第二階段。s period of history the great mother Culture has raised a dozen of children with the name of art, music, literature… while there are some wise boys such as math, physical ,biology…who are educated by dad, would like to say , science is the power that bines everyone39。演講內(nèi)容：20分。四、人員分工評委：李治中王太泉薛二強王蕾蕾總分：王利利協(xié)調(diào)：崔進京五、評分表（附后）第四篇：英語演講準(zhǔn)備是搞好演講的前提。演講稿的寫作演講稿首先開頭要開門見山，既要一下子抓住聽眾又要提出你的觀點，中間要用各種方法和所準(zhǔn)備的材料說明、支持你的論點，感染聽眾，然后在結(jié)尾