【正文】 ere any part of it that resonated with you through the lens of yourown work that you39。t change, but the context and the way we regulatethese relationships changes a ，即主要由責(zé)任和義務(wù)集體和忠誠(chéng)主義支配的模式。 and then leading usFOMO, fear of missed opportunity, orfear of missing outit39。the right one?39。 Stable ambiguity is when you are too afraid to bealone but also not really willing to engage in 39。在這種狀態(tài)下，強(qiáng)調(diào)情感關(guān)系中的不界定屬性但同時(shí)能讓你維持這段關(guān)系以及自由做出選擇的空間?！坝撵`階段”基本上是指你突然不再做出選擇、不再應(yīng)對(duì)你給對(duì)方帶來(lái)的痛苦，因?yàn)槟阕约憾佳诙I鈴。當(dāng)我在聽(tīng)你演講的時(shí)候我想到了這些，正如語(yǔ)言重現(xiàn)現(xiàn)實(shí)一樣。t always know the degree to which a changing context...Does it at somepoint begin to changeIf the meaning changes, does it change the need, or isthe need clear of the entire context?你研究大腦，而我研究情侶關(guān)系。ve changed, thatwe now want a person to love, and for thousands of years, we had to marry theright person from the right background and right kin in fact,in my studies of 5,000 people every year, I ask them, 39。海倫：是的。超過(guò)97%的人都表示想找尊重自己、值得信任的、能交心的、能逗你笑的、花時(shí)間陪自己的以及長(zhǎng)相看著順眼的人。s exactly : They said they wanted somebody withwhom they have panionship, economic support, went from aproduction economy to a service did it in the larger culture, and we39。sinteresting, the millennials actually want to be very good parents, whereas thegeneration above them wants to have a very fine marriage but is not as focusedon being a good see all of these ：是的，這一點(diǎn)毫無(wú)疑問(wèn)但有趣的是，如今千禧一代非?？释蔀楹细竦募议L(zhǎng)，而他們的上一代人希望有個(gè)美滿的婚姻，但卻不向他們一樣專(zhuān)注于成為合格的家長(zhǎng)，你可以看到這些細(xì)微的差別。s your , what I39。s no question about it that this is a were millions ofyears where you found that sweet boy at the other side of the water hole, andyou went for 。mnot suggesting that we do, but the bottom line is, we39。re seeing another playout of that ：還有一件事歸根結(jié)底，在狩獵及采集社會(huì)中，人們一生中通常有2到3個(gè)伴侶他們并不是兩兩相對(duì)的。re going to have a million dinner partners for tonight!KS：非常感謝兩位。我們每天都生活并享受在科技的成果中。當(dāng)你欣喜若狂地解出一道數(shù)學(xué)題時(shí)，可否想到還有另一種解法？當(dāng)你面對(duì)節(jié)約用水的傳統(tǒng)對(duì)策時(shí)，可否想到還有更好的措施？生活用品、學(xué)習(xí)用具的小改進(jìn)就是創(chuàng)造。同學(xué)們，今后讓我們努力學(xué)習(xí)科學(xué)知識(shí)，勤于觀察，勇于探索，用創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)綴人生，讓科技融入理想！我的演講完畢，謝謝大家！第三篇：Photosthatchangedtheworld(改變世界的照片TED演講)Photos that changed the world Good moring, name is Xiehonglan,I e from Fuzhou, the capital city of Fujian faces the island of Taiwan,off the China area nurtures many eminent scholars and politicians of the Chinese contemporary history,such as Yanfu,BinXing and Lin love my graduated from Nankai my topic is Photos that changed the world To start with, I want to ask a you believe images can change the world? However, the truth is that we know that the images themselves don’t change the world, but we are also aware that, since the beginning of photography, images have provoked reactions in people, and those reactions have caused change to let’s begin with a group of images, they are so wellknown, you might even recognize them in a different I think we are looking for something are looking for images that shine an unpromising light on crucial issues, images that transcend borders, that transcend religions, images that provoke us to step up and do other words, to , this image, you have all changed our view of the physical have never seen our planet from this perspective people credit a lot of the birth of the environmental movement to our seeing the planet like this for the first time, its smallness, its years later, this groupare aware of the destructive power that our species can wield over our images taken by Brent Stirton in the Congo, these gorillas were murdered, some would even say crucified, and unsurprisingly, they sparked international , images have power to shed light of understanding on suspicion, ignorance, and in particularthe issue of HIV/ the 1980s, people avoided talking about the simple act, in 1987, of the most famous woman in the world, the Princess of Wales, touching an HIV/AIDS infected baby, did a great deal, especially in Europe, to stop , better than most, knew the power of an when we are confronted by a powerful image, we all have a can look away, or we can address the , when these photos appeared in the Guardian in 1998, they put a lot of focus and attention, and in the end, a lot of money, towards the Sudan famine relief the images change the world? No, but they had a major Adams said, “you don’t take a photograph, you make it.” In my view, it’s not the photographer who makes the photo, it’s bring to each image, our own values, our own belief systems, and as a result of that, the image resonates with us.第四篇：TED演講綠色未來(lái)（A Greener Future?）大家好，我是Zach。為了確保讀者們不會(huì)在大量的演講中迷失了方向，TED網(wǎng)站貼心地將所有的演講分門(mén)別類(lèi)，歸納到不同的主題中，既方便讀者們針對(duì)自己感興趣的內(nèi)容有選擇地觀看演講，也便于大家觀看和某一演講相關(guān)的其他內(nèi)容。阿爾馬約拉而生物學(xué)家愛(ài)德華戈?duì)?Al Gore)：美國(guó)政治人物，曾于1993年至2001年間在比爾古道爾(Jane Goodall)：英國(guó)生物學(xué)家、動(dòng)物行為學(xué)家和著名動(dòng)物保育人士。除了對(duì)黑猩猩的研究，珍由于珍”)” Smits 修復(fù)雨林透過(guò)復(fù)雜的生態(tài)學(xué)，生物學(xué)家Willie Smits發(fā)掘一個(gè)重新植林的快捷方式，在婆羅洲救回了許多棲息于當(dāng)?shù)氐募t毛猩猩，進(jìn)而創(chuàng)造出一個(gè)得以修復(fù)脆弱生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的藍(lán)圖。現(xiàn)在，他為我們講述大海面臨的日益嚴(yán)重的塑料碎片污染問(wèn)題。如果大家對(duì)此專(zhuān)欄有何建議的話，歡迎大家在下面留言，或是電郵至OTP at TEDtoChina dot 我們下期再見(jiàn)。經(jīng)使用計(jì)算機(jī)數(shù)字鑒識(shí)方法深入檢視后，他解釋了其運(yùn)作原理。這些裝置與運(yùn)作我們城市和國(guó)家的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施有密切關(guān)系，這使它們逐漸成為一場(chǎng)新興且具高度復(fù)雜型態(tài)的電子戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)攻擊目標(biāo)。Ralph Langner的英語(yǔ)網(wǎng)上資料網(wǎng)站：Langner[TED科技?娛樂(lè)?設(shè)計(jì)]已有中譯字幕的TED影片目錄（繁體）（簡(jiǎn)體）。因此，我們從Windows釋放程序開(kāi)始，讓病毒載體進(jìn)入灰色方塊中，破壞離心機(jī)，延遲伊朗的核計(jì)劃，任務(wù)完成，很簡(jiǎn)單，對(duì)吧？我想說(shuō)明我們是如何發(fā)現(xiàn)這個(gè)的，當(dāng)我們?cè)诎肽昵伴_(kāi)始研究Stuxnet時(shí)，對(duì)這個(gè)東西的攻擊目標(biāo)一無(wú)所知，唯一了解的是它在Windows的部份非常、非常復(fù)雜，釋放程序部份使用多個(gè)零日漏洞，它似乎想要做些什么，用這些灰色方塊，這些實(shí)時(shí)控制系統(tǒng)，因此，這引起我們的注意，我們開(kāi)始了一個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)計(jì)劃，我們用Stuxnet感染我們的系統(tǒng)并審視結(jié)果，然后一些非常有趣的事發(fā)生了。釋放程序在這些灰色方塊中有效的潛伏著，如果它發(fā)現(xiàn)了一個(gè)特定程序組態(tài)，甚至是它正試圖感染的程序，它都會(huì)確實(shí)針對(duì)這個(gè)目標(biāo)執(zhí)行，如果沒(méi)發(fā)現(xiàn)，Stuxnet就不起作用。如果你曾聽(tīng)過(guò)Stuxnet的釋放程序，是復(fù)雜、高科技的，讓我跟你們說(shuō)明一下。為了找到推測(cè)目標(biāo)，我們想到，它必定具有絕對(duì)破壞性，必定是一個(gè)高價(jià)值目標(biāo)，最可能設(shè)置在伊朗，因?yàn)檫@是大部份感染發(fā)生的地點(diǎn)。我們也看到了這次攻擊的目標(biāo)，實(shí)際上進(jìn)行的相當(dāng)緩慢、低調(diào)，顯然為了達(dá)成目標(biāo)，快把維修工程師逼瘋了，因?yàn)樗麄儫o(wú)法迅速找出答案。而它甚至更有幫助?？傊?，我們找到了這兩個(gè)數(shù)字彈頭，實(shí)際上是針對(duì)同一個(gè)目標(biāo)，但從不同角度。下方是灰色方塊，頂端你們看到的是離心機(jī)，這些東西所做的是攔截來(lái)自傳感器的輸入值，例如，來(lái)自壓力傳感器和振動(dòng)傳感器的，它提供正常代碼，在攻擊中依然執(zhí)行，用的是假的輸入數(shù)據(jù)。當(dāng)它們被破壞，真正糟糕的事就會(huì)發(fā)生了，你的工廠會(huì)爆炸，無(wú)論你的操作員或安全系統(tǒng)都無(wú)法注意到這一點(diǎn)，這很可怕。所以，不幸的是，這種攻擊最大量的目標(biāo)并不是在中東，而是在美國(guó)、歐洲和日本。因此，背后的主導(dǎo)力量是網(wǎng)絡(luò)超級(jí)大國(guó)，只有一個(gè)，就是