【正文】 financial and technological support will flood in for the conservation of natural and cultural resources.On the negative side, tourism develops sometimes at the expense of part of culture. Food, festivals, costumes and other stimulating elements of a culture are highlighted to entertain tourists, constituting an insult to the locals and causing damage to the unique nature of a culture. Moreover, cultural mercialization has made the sacred elements of a culture monplace and tourists are encouraged to attach little importance to a unique tradition, which cannot be found elsewhere.In the light of these facts, one can conclude that tourism is neither a boon nor a bane to cultural preservation. While its endeavour lo protect an indigenous culture should be recognized, it has put the integrity of a culture at risk.近義詞表1. unarguably= unquestionably =indisputably=undeniably:無可置提地，無可否認(rèn)地2. destination=site=place:地點(diǎn) 3. maintenance=preservation=upholding=protection:保護(hù)，保存4. indigenous=original=aboriginal：本土的，原始的 5. fame=reputation=recognition=eminence:名氣，名聲6. at the expense of=at the cost of:以犧牲…為前提 7. entertain=amuse=keep somebody amused:使愉快8. insult=offence:侮辱 9. monplace=ordinary: 平凡的10. in the light of=in view of=considering=taking into account:考慮到11. endeavour=effort=attempt:努力，嘗試 12. integrity=entirety=unity:完整性13. put at risk=endanger=jeopardise:危及，使…危險政府投資政府的投資主要有以下用途：? 國防（defense):保護(hù)一個國家免受攻擊或者其他威脅（Protect a country against attack or other threats.)；? 保證法律和公共秩序的實施（enforcement of law and public order)以及政府的運(yùn)作（operation of government)；? 社會保障（social security)和醫(yī)療保健（health care systems)；? 福利 (welfare):為那些不能夠自給自足的人（people who are unable to support themselves alone)提供經(jīng)濟(jì)援助(financial assistance ),包括退休和殘疾人的福利（retirement and disability benefits)、失業(yè)工人的福利（unemployment benefits)等；政府援助在這一方面是重要的，可以 減輕社會壓力（release the pressure of society),并最終幫助這些人獲得生存能力（gain the ability to survive)；? 公共運(yùn)輸(public transportation)和公共服務(wù)(public services)。范文In recent years, there have been more and more countries involved and interested in longterm space projects. Because of the enormous research expenditures incurred, the value of space projects has been disputed. Some people suggest that government funding should be diverted toward improving the living standard of ordinary people. In evaluating the merits of space ambition, one should adopt a broader perspective. The investment in space research can be paid off someday in the future.The first reason to support it is that our planet is now facing an unprecedented resource problem, which can be tackled only by discovering and mining new resources on other planets. The overuse or scarcity of some resources on the Earth is a severe problem. Rare metals, such as gold or silver, will eventually be depleted, as industrial production expands. These metals and other natural resources, although rare on Earth, might abound on other planets. In that case, conducting space research is a promising adventure.Meanwhile, the world39。反對登月的可能意見：?消耗資源和時間（consume resources and take time)，而沒太大的效果（benefits are limited)； ?分散政府和公眾在一些更重要事情上的注意力（distract the government and the public from some more significant issues) 范文The idea of travelling through space, even living and working on other planets, has fascinated people for centuries. Despite numerous setbacks and daunting expenditures, travelling in the outer space has never failed to attract people39。s youths bee increasingly interested in such subjects as merce, finance and business, space exploration successfully attracts and retains talents in spacerelated technologies. These young minds are convinced that travelling the unknown of the universe is feasible ， despite many challenges. They are inspired to think for the future, instead of being preoccupied with contemporary issues only.It should also be noted that the Moon has water, the basic resource for people39。而藝術(shù)作為人們的愛好和文化傳統(tǒng)(cultural traditions),會代代相傳(passed on from one generation to another),因此不需要政府投資。s development, should be one of the highest priorities. Those underdeveloped cities in particular, should direct sufficient funding toward public facilities. While municipal office buildings, courthouses and post offices are essential ponents of public services, libraries, hospitals, parks, playing fields, gymnasiums and swimming pools are available to the public for social, educational, athletic and cultural activities. By boosting spending on public facilities, cities are more capable to satisfy the needs of citizens and improve their standard of living.In addition to social benefits, there are economic merits that public facilities can offer to munities. An integrated transport network (maritime, land and inland waterways transport and civil aviation), for example, promises the smooth and speedy movement of goods and people in a city. Industrial products, as well as agricultural produce of a city, can be delivered to other cities in exchange for steady ine. Of equal importance are public Internet facilities. Providing access to information by improving Internet and other telemunications facilities has relevance to the ease with which businesses in a city receive, process, utilize and send information. It is no exaggeration to say that entrepreneurs, either from home or abroad, will first examine the infrastructure of a city before deciding whether to pursue business opportunities there.The arts, by parison, although enabling people to see the world and the human condition differently and to see a truth one might ignore before, do not merit government spending. The first reason is that the arts referring to music, film and literature altogether are more likely to attract the investment of the private sector than public facilities. Business people continue to invest in the arts in the expectation of earning lump sum ine and the arts in return, continue to flourish without the government spending. Meanwhile