【正文】 的基本特征。股權轉讓合同效力判斷的基本原則在處理股權轉讓合同效力問題時，必須遵循一定的基本原則。 丁贛南，“股權轉讓合同效力研究”，《商品與質量公司股權的流轉、交易和變動，不僅涉及到交易雙方的法益和權利義務劃分，而且受到公權力強制性規(guī)范的調整，可以輕易突破合同相對性原則，涉及到其它合作股東的人合利益和資合利益，涉及到公司內部的治理結構及組織構成，涉及到債權人的價值判斷和解決手段的選擇，涉及到與政府的社會責任，是在股東與股東之間、公司與外界社會之間的利益和權利保護的再次衡平。（3）國家應用公權力強制規(guī)范手段進行干預　　鑒于公司的復雜性和公司在經濟生活中的重要地位，國家為了公共利益目的可以進入公司運營的私領域進行適度干涉和規(guī)范，在保障股權的前提下，保證市場有序運行。另一方面，作為股權轉讓的受讓人，也要具備成為商事主體即公司股東的特別要件，也就是說，對于某些公司來講，要成為其公司的股東，必須符合特定的條件。一、有限責任公司股權轉讓合同效力判斷的基本理論問題（一）股權轉讓合同的概念與特征股權轉讓合同的概念通常來說，涉及股權轉讓的雙方當事人都會簽訂一份股權轉讓合同，作為雙方股權轉讓的依據。另一方面，在司法實踐中，關于有限責任公司股權轉讓的糾紛有很多，而相當數量的糾紛都與合同效力有關，諸如：公司章程的規(guī)定對股權轉讓合同效力的影響、股東優(yōu)先購買權對股權轉讓合同效力的影響、瑕疵出資對股權轉讓合同效力的影響、隱名投資行為對股權轉讓合同效力的影響等。因此，股權轉讓合同，也相應包括有限責任公司和股份有限公司兩種股權轉讓合同。狹義的股權轉讓指依照當事人的合意，公司股東將其所持有的公司股權轉讓給其他民事主體的法律行為。 Defective capital contribution。 Equity transfer contract。s defective capital contribution fact, should be based on the principle of public summons, such defective share transfer contract is deemed to be valid。關鍵詞：有限責任公司；股權轉讓合同；效力；公司章程；瑕疵出資；股東優(yōu)先購買權；隱名投資Limited liability pany equity transfer contract effectiveness——an empirical analysis of the research angle of viewAbstractWith the development of modern market economy, equity has gradually bee an important legal forms of social wealth. Since the transfer of shares is limited to the transfer of pany ownership transfer, does not cause the interruption of normal business pany, also is advantageous to the assignee at low cost and high efficiency features such as the way into the pany, are increasingly favored by investors. In practice, limited liability pany shareholders opt out mainly by the transfer of equity, the equity transfer and dispute is also being more and more. Although the original pany law in our country for equity transfer of limited liability pany has regulation, but because too principle and simple, frequency leads to problems in the judicial practice. Relatively intact because of this, the new pany law established a limited liability pany shares transfer system framework, made detailed provisions and provisions of the original. But due to the rapid development of market economy, the current legislative provisions and belong to a level, the principle of on practice and is still plagued by many problems in judicial practice, judges and scholars of law and judicial practice has poured into great enthusiasm to solve these problems, has carried on the unremitting research. This paper will adopt the method of empirical analysis, bining with already collected cases, use of contract law and pany law system and principle, with the limited liability pany equity transfer contract effectiveness a monographic study on several important matters to do. This paper is divided into five parts: The first part discuss the basic theory of equity transfer contract effectiveness judgment problem. The author mainly from the concept and characteristics of equity transfer contract, the basic principles of equity transfer contract effectiveness judgment point of view in this paper. The second part discuss the provisions of the pany39。筆者認為，對于瑕疵股權轉讓合同的效力，應區(qū)分情況予以認定：如果公司登記材料明確記載股東瑕疵出資事實的，應該基于公示公信原則，將此類瑕疵股權轉讓合同認定為有效；如果公司登記材料無法反映出股東出資瑕疵的事實的，則要根據是否存在欺詐情形來確定該合同是否有效。筆者認為對于沒有滿足股東優(yōu)先購買權的股權轉讓合同的效力判斷不可一概而論，而應具體考察受讓人的善意狀態(tài)。筆者主要從股權轉讓合同的概念與特征、股權轉讓合同效力判斷的基本原則的角度論述。有鑒于此，新《公司法》較為完整地確立了有限責任公司股權轉讓的制度框架，并對原有的條文作出了細化規(guī)定。 學位論文作者簽名： 日期： 年 月 日摘要隨著現代市場經濟的發(fā)展，股權已經逐步成為社會財富的重要法律表現形式。西北政法大學碩士學位論文有限責任公司股權轉讓合同效力研究——一個實證分析的視角作者姓名：吉 睆專 業(yè)：法律碩士（非法學）研究方向：民 商 法指導教師：張 曉 飛 副教授培養(yǎng)單位：法律碩士教育學院西北政法大學碩士學位論文獨立完成與誠信聲明本人鄭重聲明：所呈交的碩士學位論文，是本人在指導教師的指導下，獨立進行研究工作所取得的成果。本人完全意識到本聲明的法律結果由本人承擔。盡管我國原公司法對有限責任公司的股權轉讓已有規(guī)定，但因過于原則和簡陋，導致在司法實踐中問題頻生。本文共分五個部分：第一部分討論有限責任公司股權轉讓合同效力判斷的基本理論問題。第三部分討論股東優(yōu)先購買權對股權轉讓合同效力的影響。第四部分討論瑕疵出資對股權轉讓合同效力的影響。筆者認為隱名投資者股東資格的判斷，應當以《公司法司法解釋三》第二十五的規(guī)定為原則，同時，對于隱名投資者簽訂的股權轉讓合同，如果該股權轉讓是隱名投資者的真實意思表示，整個股權轉讓程序符合法律的規(guī)定，則應認定為合法有效。t think to satisfy the shareholders right of first refusal of the equity transfer contract effectiveness judgment not to generalize, but detailed study state of the assignee of goodwill. If the assignee subjective is wellintentioned, under the condition of the contract shall take effect with other elements, shall be deemed to be valid. If the transferee is subjectively malicious, the equity transfer contract shall be deemed to be null. The fourth part discuss the effects of defective capital contribution to the equity transfer contract effectiveness. The author thinks that, regarding the defective equity transfer of the effectiveness of the contract, shall be identified to distinguish the situation: if the pany registration material history of shareholder39。 On the other hand, as long as the assignee of responsibility for the make up for, the equity transfer contract is signed by both sides is valid. The fifth section discusses dormant investment behavior on the influence of the equity transfer contract effectiveness. The author thinks that the judgment of concealed investor shareholders qualifications, shall be in the pany law judicial interpretation three 25 provisions for the principle, at the same time, the equity transfer contract signed for silent investors, if the equity transfer is the real intention of dormant investors, the stock transfer procedures in accordance with legal provisions, it shall be deemed to be valid. Keywords：Limited liability pany。s articles of association。 Dormant investment目錄引言 1一、有限責任公司股權轉讓合同效力判斷的基本理論問題 2（一）股權轉讓合同的概念與特征 2股權轉讓合同的概念 2股權轉讓合同的特征 2（二）股權轉讓合同效力及其判斷的基本原則 3股權轉讓合同效力 3股權轉讓合同效力判斷的基本原則 3二、公司章程的規(guī)定對股權轉讓合同效力的影響 5（一）案例介紹 5強制轉讓股東權引發(fā)的糾紛 5對強制轉讓股權糾紛的判例分析 5（二）法律分析 61．公司章程的規(guī)定對股權轉讓合同效力的影響的不同觀點 62. 筆者的觀點 7三、股東優(yōu)先購買權對股權轉讓合同效力的影響 9（一）案例介紹 9因優(yōu)先購買權的行使引發(fā)的股權轉讓糾紛 9對侵犯優(yōu)先購買權的判例分析 10（二）法律分析 11股東優(yōu)先購買權的權利性質 11股東優(yōu)先購買權的行使 11侵犯優(yōu)先