【正文】 enging times, to move people with his words.s Speech. Still, this film hasn39。其中大部分來(lái)自美國(guó)，試圖解釋其原因的利基理論比比皆是。我們希望自己獨(dú)一無(wú)二而且被獨(dú)立看待，這是很正常的。對(duì)影片的這樣一種詮釋讓一部分人痛苦，又讓另一部分人歡欣。re watching a sort of cinematic royal wedding) provokes even deeper alarm. Yet the film dwells on grandiose spectacle far less than it might have done, or perhaps than its limited budget would have allowed.其實(shí)應(yīng)該是皇家服飾本身（我們?cè)谟^賞“電影版的皇室婚禮”）讓這些觀眾更為敏感。s a straightforward matter of triumph over adversity, with the tale adhering strictly to the rule so memorably spelt out in Tropic Thunder: Never go full retard. Or it39。 也許這就是一個(gè)講述克服逆境的簡(jiǎn)單故事，其情節(jié)嚴(yán)格遵守《熱帶驚雷》中深刻闡明的道理：主角要有缺陷，但不能完全是白癡。s to prove you wrong? There39。如果你要用個(gè)人偏見來(lái)支持自己的理論，那么要如何證明你錯(cuò)了？詢問(wèn)影迷也沒(méi)有多大作用，因?yàn)樵S多理論會(huì)臆斷影迷們擁有一些潛意識(shí)反應(yīng)，而且即便影迷認(rèn)識(shí)到這種反應(yīng)存在也可能不肯承認(rèn)。s all about gender: The damaged king, who by artistic sleight of hand is Everyman, can be restored to full potency when he gets his voice back. Then he can lead his people into war.羅伯茨而言，本片就是關(guān)于性別的：“從藝術(shù)手法上講，有缺陷的國(guó)王象征了所有普通人，當(dāng)他重獲話語(yǔ)權(quán)時(shí)，就能恢復(fù)所有力量?；舨J(rèn)為本片和《阿凡達(dá)》一樣是在挖掘相同的跨文化理念。 we39。So, like many of the critics (and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences nominators), they point to what they deem to be magnificent acting, a fine script, classy production design and, for that matter, impressive cinematography, costumes, editing, score and soundmix. Yet, even if you39。ve now learned different, but to benefit from this lesson, there39。 業(yè)內(nèi)專家并不知道答案，因?yàn)樗麄儾](méi)有預(yù)料到本片的勝利。s something we need to know. Just why has The King39。 while even if the right films were to get made, they couldn39。t be found。s no longer a bigscreen audience for smallscale drama. That older cinemagoers have bee extinct. That Britflicks shouldn39。 普遍看法是，如今不再有觀眾在大銀幕上觀看小成本戲劇。 s not just the ecstatic reviews, the sackload of awards and the startling box office takings. This is a film that39。它讓人們?cè)诮值郎吓抨?duì)等待觀影、在播放演職員表時(shí)起立鼓掌。t matter all that much. This film can manage without Hollywood39。t goes over board. And hits the bulls eye ! Perfect balance.All points considered, it39。s Speech is a rare piece, indeed.The movie starts off with a stammering speech and signs off with a staggering one, with hardly any glitches in between. The basic premise of the movie is fairly simple. A king with a stutter is helped by a maverick speech therapist to overe his problem and bee an inspiring orator. That sounds like a very known territory to most movie goers. But few minutes into the movie, and you realize that this one simply pushes the bar a notch higher.It is a very pleasing movie, doesn39。s promise. The King39。t miss), Geoffrey Rush goes a bit more old school and pulls off a subtle and deep portrayal. One that fills up your heart but also keeps your brain active. Humor es in here and there, with a very easy flow and steady pace. Not for a single moment do you perceive the movie as dull. Helena Bonham Carter is good. Guy Pearce is approp