不能簡單看待印度的不平等問題-全文預(yù)覽
【正文】 galitarianofbutlowestinruralopportunityvotedwithtofromones,farurbanIndianpleteispleteequality—201011providedlevelling.moreprovidesnoThis年到socialismcouldliberalisation2012,lineliftedboomingcertainlyBy年獨立以后的年代不平等程度大幅減輕。inpoorHencetheafterindependenceunchangedpovertyIndiansthetaxesandtheinequalityThe稅收當(dāng)局將資本收益視為收入。nottheirfromanddoine.countisdataChancel’s那個時代的不平等程度當(dāng)然遠比現(xiàn)在嚴(yán)重。40%的印度地區(qū)被muchthatBritishwealthy,theirtheBritish.byofoverin,allrubbishproblemofthisSomethodologicalaccountsdatasurvey,that這充其量說對了一半。atThatderegulationpolicies”erafair,distributionallyplanningthetheofdistinguishotherOneproblems年經(jīng)濟自由化啟動之后。1980195122%的國民收入，是economicafterinandbetween1persharetaxsincenationalperin1concludeMessrsnationaldataato19222014:現(xiàn)在皮凱蒂與盧卡斯?錢斯?fàn)?Lucas世紀(jì)資本論》(Capitalinto19222014:paperChancel,PikettyinehighlyathatFrencheconomistthebestsellinghisinthearguedhaveincubateofNowMrLucasnewInequality,RajPiketty)在其暢銷書《21Century)中辯稱，資本主義經(jīng)濟有著孵化高度不平等的收入和財富分配的自然傾向。Inequality,RajUsingoftax,householdsurveys,Chanceltopofearners22IndianhighestshareineThetopsharply1980,againparticularlyof1%高收入人群獲得了這個人群的收入份額在年間大幅下降，隨后在1991twoargument.Thetokindssuchcaveats,thatsocialistwasthemarketunfair.halftruth除了此類問題以外，該文還暗示稱，從分配的角度說，印度的社會主義計劃時代是公平的
教學(xué)教案相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1