【正文】
性,因?yàn)樗袡?quán)的效率和分配后果是高度交織在一起。 3 OWNERSHIP ORGANIZATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE Kang, David L.。 Means corporation may only have limited relevance (La Porta et al 1998). Therefore, we conclude that ownership is an important but neglected sociological and anizational variable that deserves continued academic inquiry. 。rensen, B.. Annual Review of Sociology, 1999, : p121. Recent work in anizational sociology has made considerable progress toward understanding how certain features of the governance systems found in modern public corporations affect a range of important firm outes. The functional backgrounds of corporate officers, the proportion of outsider directors, the separation of the Chairman and CEO positions, and the social works found across firms have been used to predict outes such as corporate diversification policies, and the use of the multidivisional anizational form. This research has generally downplayed the role of ownership in corporate governance and assumed that ownership and control are effectively separated. By contrast, financial economic research continues to question the role of ownership in understanding control of the firm, although this research tradition has produced highly mixed results on the relationship between ownership anization and performance. The study of ownership anization and its effect on performance should not be left pletely to financial economic research. The study of who controls the use of capital and how this control affects the creation and distribution of wealth in society has long been an important line of intellectual inquiry, originating with Marx. Studying the relationships of individuals and firms to property with a broader and more flexible approach may provide important insights into the efficiency and distributive consequences of modern capitalist firms. The actual and potential contributions of sociology to this line of inquiry seem particularly important at the present time, and it is therefore timely to assess what is known, and not known