【正文】
George Orwell has read the book au lease six times in his life. He said,” If I am asked to list six books which should be kept even if other books are destroyed, Gulliver’s Travels would definitely be included.” Since it was published, the status of Swift’s Gulliver’s travels had not been changed in the literary history because it mented on current affairs in a unique way, which reflected spirit of the time and the needs of masses. And the foreign scholars have researched it for a long time.Howard Erskine ? Hill [1] thinks Gulliver confirms the official religion at the end of the third part of Gulliver’s travels and judges others and himself according to his religion. He thinks that Gulliver is not a secular person, but a humble Christian who lacks of consideration. Similarly, Michael McKean [2] thinks that Swift does not mention the “original sin” in the novel as a devout Christian in Virtue and Truth in Gulliver’s Travels, because the religious ideas have been thoroughly infiltrated his social views. It is not difficult to know the author’s religious ideas by analyzing all the deeds of Gulliver. The two persons’ views all show that Gulliver’s travels does exist the Christian element. They interpret Swift’s deep understanding of the religion through a detailed analysis of the novel content.In China, the research of Gulliver’s travels should not be underestimated. Throughtechniquecontrastin Company, Inc., 2002: 331.[3] 伍厚愷. 簡論諷喻體小說《格列佛游記》及其文學(xué)地位[J]. 四川大學(xué)學(xué)報, 1999(5): 911.[4] 丁世忠. 論《格列佛游記》的怪誕美學(xué)風(fēng)格[J]. 南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報, 2008(1): 118121.[5] 曹波. 格列佛的異化:從經(jīng)濟人到政治人[J]. 外語教學(xué), 2008(5): 7885.[6] 孫紹先. 論《格列佛游記》的科學(xué)主題[J]. 外國文學(xué)研究, 2002(4): 99102.[7] 李洪斌. 論《格列佛游記》的道德教育內(nèi)涵[J]. 齊齊哈爾大學(xué)學(xué)報, 2011(6): 102104.[8] 劉戈. 笛福和斯威夫特的野蠻人[J]. 外國文學(xué)評論, 2007(3): 120127.八、指導(dǎo)教師審核意見: 指導(dǎo)教師簽字: 年 月 日九、系(教研室)評議意見: 系(教研室)主任簽字: 年 月 日十、開題小組評審意見:開題小組負(fù)責(zé)人簽字: 年 月 日十一、學(xué)院領(lǐng)導(dǎo)審核意見:1.通過; 2.完善后通過; ?。常赐ㄟ^ 學(xué)院領(lǐng)導(dǎo)簽字: 年 月 日8。novel, Wu Houkai [3] deeply exposes the variety of corruption and ugly of the British capitalist society’s political, eco