【正文】 1c0cbc0bfd9cb9a592702f5d5506e10e Editted By Addison Wang 1 自己的 issue高頻提綱 教育 3 月北京第 2 How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society.孩子們的社會化決定社會的命運(yùn)。不幸的是我們還不知道怎樣撫養(yǎng)孩子才能使他們對將來的社會有用。 This statement actually consist of two claims. First, the destiny of society is determined by how children are socialized today. Second, we have not yet learned how to raise children to be petent to help bring about a better society. As far as I am concerned, I disagree with both of the two claims. (1) There is no denying that children is the hope of a nation so that how children are socialized is indeed crucial for the future society. (2) However, the socialization of children is only one of the factors t hat determine the development of children, and yet it may not the most important one. (3) What is the most important, consider the item ―better society‖ as equality, prosperity, stabilization, then we do have experienced great improvement and progress during the last decades, the time of those who once were the childern of our society, which means we do actually know how to raise children to contribute a better society. We devote to raise children in health, not only in physical but also in mental. Merits such as honesty, responsibility, persistence, kindness and so on are the core lessons should be taken to children. 歷史與人民 3 月北京第 4 The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been fotten.歷史研究把太多重點(diǎn)放在對某些個(gè)人上 .歷史上一些重大事件和發(fā)展趨勢不是由個(gè)別名人決定的 ,而可能是由那些已經(jīng)被淡忘的人制造的。 There is always a debate on whether the famous few or the groups of people nameless contribute to the significant events and trends in history. Different people have different views according to their different experience, beliefs and positions. The arguer is in favor of that the most significant events and trends in history were made by groups of people whose identities have long been fotten. Though one can hardly say with certainty that history was created by the very individuals or ordinary people, in my view, I agree with the arguer’s point more. 1. Admittedly, in some areas such as art and science, a group of key individuals have played a more crucial role than fettable groups of people. It is Newton, who laid the foundation of calculus, formulated three fundamental laws of mechanics, leading to the law of gravitation. It is Einstein who put forward Theory of 1c0cbc0bfd9cb9a592702f5d5506e10e Editted By Addison Wang 2 Relativity and also gave a perfect interpretation of the photoelectric effect. It is Beethoven who left the world with so many great positions, which are so infective, unfettable and can not be replaced. It is Shakespeare, who created the greatest English literature. 2. However, most of the time, the most significant events and trends in history were made possible by groups of ordinary people. Though decisions were made by the key individuals but they were pleted by fettable groups of people. Take the Chinese famous historic building, Great Wall, as an instance. Though it is the first emperor of ancient dynasty Qing who decided to construct Great Wall, however, without thousands upon thousands labour forces how can the great wall be established? And Pyramid perhaps can be regarded as the similar example to illuminate this point. 3. In another place, though the famous few played a crucial role in some significant events and trend in history, sometimes these trends are inevitable and if without those famous few, there would be others played such important roles instead of them. President Abraham Lincoln gave the American Civil War a new political direction. He had freed Negro slaves in the rebel states of the south as well as saved the Union. His contribution to human freedom can not be fotten, however, if there were no Abraham Lincoln there might be another Lincoln sooner or later to fulfill this great mission. 4. Additionally, we, mon people, all flock to the powerful and the beautiful. Thus, newspapers and TV stations report a mass of information, even trivia sometimes, to cater for our taste. Therefore information about the famous individual was kept down but insufficient materials of groups of people were remained. So, possibly, it is we ourselves, the mon people, who have shaped the history, such that it concentrates on important individuals 藝術(shù)家和評論家 3 月北京第 13 It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value. *a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc. 是藝術(shù)家而不是批評家，給了社會一些永久的價(jià)值。 *批評家指經(jīng)常評價(jià)藝術(shù)作品 ，例如小說、電影、音樂、繪畫等的人。 the arguer insists that it is the artist gives society something of lasting value, but not the critics. As far as I am concerned, there is no denying that artist gives society something of lasting value. However, constructive criticism not only can help the public to appreciate artistic work but also can help artist promote their working level. Therefore, in my opinion, artist gives society something of lasting value while critic also contributes to the lasting value. 1. first of all, there is no doubt that it is the creative minds and skillful works of artists that make our quotidian life colorful and give society something of lasting value. It is Da Vinci who gave the painting ―Mona Lisa‖ of lasting value 2. on the other hand, critics play an indelible role in giving society something of lasting value. (1) First, critics can help the public understand and interpret art, since their