【正文】 n更多企業(yè)學(xué)院： 《中小企業(yè)管理全能版》183套講座+89700份資料《總經(jīng)理、高層管理》49套講座+16388份資料《中層管理學(xué)院》46套講座+6020份資料《國學(xué)智慧、易經(jīng)》46套講座《人力資源學(xué)院》56套講座+27123份資料《各階段員工培訓(xùn)學(xué)院》77套講座+ 324份資料《員工管理企業(yè)學(xué)院》67套講座+ 8720份資料《工廠生產(chǎn)管理學(xué)院》52套講座+ 13920份資料《財務(wù)管理學(xué)院》53套講座+ 17945份資料《銷售經(jīng)理學(xué)院》56套講座+ 14350份資料《銷售人員培訓(xùn)學(xué)院》72套講座+ 4879份資料My ments are as follows :1. The DLP period for this contract is stated as 10 years while the warranty period is stated as 3 years. Please change the DLP period to 2 years (our standard for this project if it’s not 2 years) and 10 years warranty for the fire door. See attached for page where the DLP period is stated as 10 years.2. 回標(biāo)疑問卷1amp。5 – To remove the priced BQ from these 2 sets of documents if the BQ has been superseded by the contract BQ.3. Contract BQ – Is the design for the main entrance door type FM乙4 () the same as the Public Area timber fire door type FM乙4 ()? If it’s the same thing, please readjust the rates to tie in with each other.4. Is the BQ given plete? The total cost shown under the Contract BQ (RMB975,) does not tie up with the awarded sum (RMB1,210,).5. 專用條件a) The item in the contents page does not match with the actual clause. is know as 竣工報備in the contents page but is reflected as 竣工報表 in the actual clause.b) Clause , subclause on page SCC/38. Reference is made to clause of the 投標(biāo)須知 in paragraph 1. The 投標(biāo)須知 is not part of this contract, so please check to ensure the clause tie up, if not, to change accordingly.c) Item , Clause (a) – actual Clause mentioned in this clause can’t be foundd) Item Clause – actual Clause , mentioned in this clause can’t be foundAppreciate if you could clear the attached contract. I will go through at my end in parallel.Pls find the attached for your clearance pls. I had send to Amy before she goes on leave, but have not reverted to us.Lu, pls hold it until our clearance from legal. Sorry for inconvenience causedWith regards to Qn No. 2, our suggestion is to go for champagne color powder coat instead to match the rest of the development.item , the duration of submitting the material is too long. The whole contract period is only 1 month+. Please reduce to reasonable time frame. They are submiting perforamnce bond right? Cannot find in the LOA. Thanks.With regards to Qn No. 2, our suggestion is to go for champagne color powder coat instead to match the rest of the developmentFor the qualification of the tenderer, Main con called to advise that they will provide the qualification of the firm that they are working with in due course, which I think is ok given the tight timeline (caroline – is this ok with you ? pls advise).For design/drawings – sonny pls follow up asap.For contract provisions – yan mei pls follow up asap.By copy of this mail, appreciate Amy, Michelle and Caroline can help review in parallel and revert with your ments, if any, in parallel.Please understanding that we are calling several contracts in parallel in order to meet the tight timeline and your assistance in the above are appreciated.With regards to Qn No. 2, our suggestion is to go for champagne color powder coat instead to match the rest of the developmentPlease reply to question number 2 as a matter of urgency so DLS can reply to the tenderers.Pls include in your prelim assessment and provide the prelim assessment on Monday morningPlease reply to the following urgently. The tenderers need to do some design development as part of their tender return so we need to give some more lead timeAs per discussed yesterday, please provide the followings:1. SKK spray paint finish as a replacement material for stone cladding as indicated in Capol’s drawing. Please provide the specification for tenderers.4. Door finish.7. Please provide design intent writeup for the canopy as indicated in Capol’s drawing.Please provide in Chinese for the above where possible as we are dealing with local contractors.For the qualification of the tenderer, Main con called to advise that they will provide the qualification of the firm that they are working with in due course, which I think is ok given the tight timeline (caroline – is this ok with you ? pls advise).For design/drawings – sonny pls follow up asap.For contract provisions – yan mei pls follow up asap.By copy of this mail, appreciate Amy, Michelle and Caroline can help review in parallel and revert with your ments, if any, in parallel.Please understanding that we are calling several contracts in parallel in order to meet the tight timeline and your assistance in the above are appreciatedPer our concall for the Lift Supply LOA – ments/concensus as follow as noted by QS in the attached :1. item – order of listing – suggest update the special conditions instead2. item (3) – maintain 75% max per agreement during tender clarifications3. item (d) – suggest amend the minor error when signing the contract4. item (3) – same as item 2 above.5. other queries – as clarified by QS.As the above items have been clarified, there is no more issue with the supply LOA which KONE had stamped and returned. QS will update on the special conditions and installation LOA separately for discussion/concall asap (Jerry pls target for Friday afternoon say 4pm as spoken)Per our concall for the Lift Supply LOA – ments/concensus as follow as noted by QS in the attached :6. item – order of listing – suggest update the special conditions instead7. item (3) – maintain 75% max per agreement during tender clarifications8. item (d) – suggest amend the minor error when signing the contract9. item (3) – same as item 2 above.10. other queries – as clarified by QS.As the above items have been clarified, there is no more issue with the supply LOA which KONE had stamped and returned. QS will update on the special conditions and installation LOA separately for discussion/concall asap (Jerry