【正文】
information has even been articulated that it was deep and broad. If, in Palean time, the Brim River was merely a small brook easy to cross, the whole reasoning to conclude that the Palean baskets were not unique would be collapse. Moreover, it is dubious to argue that the ancient Palean could only have crossed it by boat, because there is no any information to support such an argument. While it might be true, it necessitates strong logical basis to make such reasoning. Suppose they crossed the river by swimming or by driving some animals that were good at swimming, how about the reasoning? Certainly the assumption would be seriously undermined. In one word, the author has actually perpetrated several logical fallacies in reasoning, making the argument unsound. To be more valid, the argument needs much more information to support some prerequisites.