【正文】
,但也同時使用于有些觀點類的題目,但是有一些觀點類的題目,由于本身范圍小,所以很難用萬能理由直接構(gòu)造層次,而需要用下面的第二個套路或者索性直接構(gòu)思一些對應(yīng)的理由或?qū)哟?。In this modern society, people always confront the dilemma of choosing whether AAA or BBB. This problem is a prevalent topic undergoing serious debate in that it affects everybody in his or her daily work. Personally, I would like to vote for AAA for three definite reasons. The main reason for my propensity for AAA is that I can think of no better illustration of the idea than the obvious fact that 事例一. The above is only part of the important aspects, and another one with equal significance with respect to choosing between the two lies in the development of the proposition that 原因二. This demonstrates the undeniable fact that 事例二. What is also worth noticing fact is that 原因三. It is undeniable that BBB has its own merits. The most extreme manifestation of the merits is the fact that 某一優(yōu)點. Even though, however, we have no plete evidence to suggest that BBB is always better that AAA. From what has been discussed above, me may safely arrived at the conclusion that advantages of AAA out weigh any benefit we can get from BBB and choosing AAA is a rather wise decision. 第二個套路:具體化、分情況、分領(lǐng)域直接拆分: 獨立寫作的題目并無對錯,所以如果硬要直接闡述,很可能會找不出理由或者理由抽象而牽強,因此對于無法使用萬能理由的題目,往往需要對題目內(nèi)容進(jìn)行以下兩種拆分?! rogress is always good. 分析:在這道題目中,“進(jìn)步”是一個抽象概念,可以細(xì)分為“方便食品”、“便捷交通”、“電腦通訊”三個層面去談?! any people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? 分析:在這道題目中,很難直接考慮寵物和人的關(guān)系對人不好,因此可以換個思維,考慮“對于小孩子來講”,“對于年輕夫婦來講”,“對于老年人來講”三個角度。除了審題之外,寫提綱還需要為每個審題層次提供細(xì)節(jié)、例子或解釋,這樣才能在寫中間斷的時候有話可說,保證充實具體?! ?spending: Outer space exploration Basic needs on Earth Opinion: Outer space exploration 1: better ways to produce food and clothing: {ways to preserve and store food} {ways to grow vegetables and fruits} {new types of clothin