【正文】 g of antimonopoly law, that is also the successful experience to effectively execute antimonopoly laws in most countries. The administrative monopoly means the abuse of administrative power, so the legal regulation about administrative monopoly must be independent with general administrative departments, and it should be balanced with the administrative power of administrative monopoly. And antimonopoly law enforcement institution must have high specialty character, and the antimonopoly law enforcement is not simple market management, and it es down to the contents about economy, law and management, so it is a plex project, which decides the personnel posing and basic conditions of antimonopoly law enforcement institutions. For example, the “Monopoly Committee” of Germany is posed by five experts from public economics, business administration, social policy, technology and economics (Lv, 2020, ). Professional organization system is the important factor to guarantee the effective operation of law enforcement institution. Independent and professional antimonopoly intuition should be endowed by extensive administrative power, quasilegislative power and quasijudicial power, and that is the need to regulate administrative monopoly in China and the requirement to treat the development of international antimonopoly. Combining the generalization mode with the listing mode to specially limit the range of administrative monopoly Because Chinese Antimonopoly Law defines the range of administrative monopoly by the listing mode, and it is mainly limited in the domain of goods trade, which induces that the regulation range of administrative monopoly in China is too narrow and lacks in corresponding flexibility. Using foreign relative experiences as references, China should adopt the mode bining the generalization mode with the listing mode to define the range of administrative monopoly. On the one hand, the main representative form of administrative monopoly should be listed specially, and the concrete regulations to regulate administrative monopoly behaviors in the domain of servicing industry should be added. And according to these rules, the antimonopoly law enforcement institutions should quickly judge representative administrative monopoly behaviors, and predict its legal result and increase the efficiency. On the other hand, according to relative authority data, the range of the industry about the national economy and the people’s livelihood should be specially defined, and the monopoly of these industries should be protected by laws, and the protective range and degree should also be defined, and for the behavior to illegally expand the monopoly range, corresponding punishment measures should be regulated. Judicial relief approach to perfect antiadministrative monopoly According to article 12 in Chinese Administrative Procedure Law, abstractive administrative behavior has not the character of justiciablity, . the abstract administrative behavior is not the object of judicial review, which doesn’t accord with relative obligation of judicial review in WTO when China entered into WTO. At present, Chinese Antimonopoly Law had brought the abstract administrative behavior into the adjusted range, but it is just the first step, and Chinese Antimonopoly Law should advance with the times and develop continually, and establish judicial review system about corresponding abstract administrative behavior, so the behavior of abstract administrative monopoly can be regulated according to law. Matching with the review system after the event, the review before the event about the abstract administrative monopoly is very necessary, . Chinese antimonopoly law enforcement institution should have the review right before the event for the administrative rules, regulations and other standard documents about the petition issued by all administrative departments including State Department, and if it thinks that relative rules block the fair petition of market, it can block the establishment and implementation of them. Through above analysis, the legal regulation of administrative monopoly behaviors in China just starts, and the relative rules about the administrative monopoly behaviors in Chinese Antimonopoly Law needs to be further perfected and crystallized, and the legal responsibilities about the administrative monopoly behaviors and the jurisdiction of law enforcement institution need to be further confirmed, and the regulation range of administration monopoly needs to be further expanded, and corresponding juridical relief approaches need to be gradually established. At the same time , the system reforms in the economic and political domain need to be further deepened, and the continual perfection of system reform can essentially reduce and stop the happening of administrat