【正文】
to Palean. 論點: Palean basket were not unique to Palean 論據(jù): 1. “Palean” basket in Lithos 2. The Brim River is very deep and broad 3. Boats capable of carrying groups of people and cargo were not developed until thousands of years after the Palean people disappeared 中間假定的論點: 1. the ancient Paleans could only have crossed it by boat. 理由 : 2. Paleans would have had no need to cross the river 理由: ? the wood around Palean are full of nuts, berries, and small game 看作者提供的事實或者數(shù)據(jù)是否能夠充分得出作者假定的論點.然后分析即使作者假設(shè)的分論點成例,是否最終的結(jié)論可以在邏輯上成立?有什么可能性削弱命題的觀點? 范 文 嘉仕花園 廣州 500words 莊子 2020312 To deny that the Palean baskets were unique to Palea, the author provides two pieces of evidence. The first is that Palean baskets have also been found in the area of Lithos. Second, there is, not was, a deep and broad river between the Li