【正文】 Ⅲ.Writint （ 30%） （答案略） 。 ，而不是在十層樓上焦慮地照看著他們。 ，父母會給孩子一塊手表，作為孩子長大的最初標志之一。相反，孩子們看著他們的父母親、親屬和鄰居在旁邊勞動，而且還經(jīng)常幫把手。但是在富裕國家，兒童也有另外一種貧窮 精神上的貧窮。 Ⅲ.Writint （ 30%） （答案略） 2020 年在職攻讀學位全國聯(lián)考教育碩士專業(yè)學位（英語二）試題冊 [供報考學科教學（英語）專業(yè)考生使用 ] [B 卷 ]答案 I. Use of English（ 10%） 1 II. Reading prehension （ 60%） Part A（ 40%） 3 Part B： （ 20%） 。 ，而不是在十層樓上焦慮地照看著他們。 ，父母會給孩子一塊手表，作為孩子長大的最初標志之 一。相反，孩子們看著他們的父母親、親屬和鄰居在旁邊勞動，而且還經(jīng)常幫把手。但是在富裕國家，兒童也有另外一種貧窮 精神上的貧窮。, there is often a sense of freedom to play. (45) Parents can see their children outsiderather than observe them anxiously from ten floors up. And other adults in the munity canusually be counted on to be caring rather than indifferent or threatening. Of course twelve million children under five still die every year through malnutrition anddisease. But children in the Third World is not all bad. Section m Writing (30%) Teachers often consider some students as good students. What do you think good studentsare like? Describe the characteristics of good students according to your own opinion. Provideone or two examples where necessary. You may also need to use knowledge in education andpsychology to support your argument. You shouM write 240280 words. Write your essay on ANSWER SHEET 2 (主觀答題紙 ). 2020 年在職攻讀學位全國陽考教育碩士專業(yè)學位（英語二）試題 [供報考學科教學（英語）專業(yè)考生使用 ] [A 卷 ]答案： of English （ 10%） 11.B prehension（ 60%） 31.B Part B（ 20%） 。don39。keep off the grass39。s work: helping to dig or build, plant or water, tend to animals or look after babies rather than through playing with water and sand in kindergarten, building with construction toys, keeping pets or playing with dolls. (43) These children may grow up with a less oppressive limitation of space and time than their Western counterparts. Set days and times are few and selfexplanatory, determined mostly by the rhythm of the seasons and the different jobs they bring. (44) A child in the rich world, on the other hand. is provided with a wristwatch as one of the earliest symbols of ~owing up. so that he or she can worry, along with their parents about being late for school times, meal times clinic times, bed times, the times of TV shows……。t tip in Europe. [C] tipping is rare in many Asian countries. [D] tipping is now popular in Iceland. 38. According to Michael Lynn, . [A] nervous people do not usually tip. [B] A merican people are anxious. [C] Icelanders don39。s coauthor, countries in which people are moreextrovert, sociable or neurotic tend to tip more. Tipping relieves anxiety about being served bystrangers: And, says39。s contracted cost, and delivered afterwards, should not exist. So why do they? The conventional wisdom is that tips both reward the efforts of good service and reduce unfortable feelings of inequality. The better the service, the bigger the tip. A paper analysing data from 2,547 groups dining at 20 different restaurants shows that the correlation between larger tips and better service was very weak: only a tiny part of the variability in the size of the tip had anything to do with the quality of service. Customers who rated a meal as excellent still tipped anywhere between 8% and 37% of the meal price. Tipping is better explained by culture than by economics. In America, the custom hasbee institutionalised: it is regarded as part of the accepted cost of a service. In a New Yorkrestaurant, failing to tip at least 15% could well mean abuse from the waiter. Hairdressers canexpect to get 1520%, the man who delivers your groceries $2. In Europe, tipping is lessmon。s attitude toward the economics mittee39。s illness delayed his receiving of the prize. [C]obert Lucas received the prize earlier than expected. [D] Robert Merton and Myron Scholes played jokes on the prize. 33. According to the text, the author39。t get it. 31. From the first paragraph, we learned that . [A] the Nobel prize in economics was created under Alfred Nobel39。 advances in empirical work and applications in the past two decades have yet to be paid due respect, a fact bemoaned by Mr Becker. Mr Samuelson adds that the economics mittee39。s fiercest critics. Gunnar Myrdal, who shared the award in 1974,said the prize ought to be abolished (but he did not return the money). Milton Friedman, winnerin 1976, doubted the ability of a few people in Stockholm to make decisions respected aroundthe world. By the 1990s, the Nobel mittee had gained a repu