【正文】 x Planck Institute）的創(chuàng)始主任 Eugen Ulmer 在他的一篇教授資格論文中，就提出了如下被認(rèn)為是綱領(lǐng)性的思想：在商標(biāo)上的依賴(lài)于 貿(mào)易價(jià)值的權(quán)利表現(xiàn)了保護(hù)的實(shí)際的目標(biāo)和保護(hù)的正當(dāng)性。因此，依賴(lài)于注冊(cè)的形式上的權(quán)利只簡(jiǎn)單地具有培育實(shí)際商譽(yù)的附屬功能。形式上的保護(hù)只被視為為該過(guò)程提供幫助的第一步。德國(guó)聯(lián)邦最高法院至少在理論上采納了 Eugen Ulmer 的解釋?zhuān)聡?guó)的立法者則已將其付諸實(shí)踐。筆者以為，使用原則注重實(shí)體公正，保護(hù)使商標(biāo)具有價(jià)值的人的利益，注冊(cè)原則側(cè)重法律秩序的穩(wěn)定性以及商標(biāo)權(quán)的確定性。因此，從法律的固有價(jià)值 公正出發(fā)，注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的保護(hù)需要從商標(biāo)的使用中獲得正當(dāng)性證明。 行文至此，我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn)，作為相互借鑒和求同存異的結(jié)果，在當(dāng) 前以注冊(cè)原則為主導(dǎo)的商標(biāo)保護(hù)構(gòu)架中呈現(xiàn)出兩個(gè)比較清晰的主題：一是如何規(guī)范注冊(cè)商標(biāo)與未注冊(cè)商標(biāo)所有人之間的關(guān)系（并進(jìn)而表現(xiàn)為商標(biāo)權(quán)與先用權(quán)之間的關(guān)系）的問(wèn)題逐漸受到重視，許多國(guó)家在堅(jiān)持注冊(cè)產(chǎn)生商標(biāo)權(quán)的大前提下，有條件地承認(rèn)商標(biāo)在先使用人的在先權(quán)；一是注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的使用要求日益受到關(guān)注，由注冊(cè)產(chǎn)生的商標(biāo)權(quán)需要從對(duì)商標(biāo)的使用中來(lái)充分確立其權(quán)利的正當(dāng)性。無(wú)論是保護(hù)商標(biāo)在先使用人的正當(dāng)利益，還是重視注冊(cè)商標(biāo)權(quán)的正當(dāng)性，都是商標(biāo)保護(hù)制度的題中應(yīng)有之義。因?yàn)?，這樣一個(gè)制度的宗旨就是規(guī)范市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序，保護(hù)公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展 。 遼寧工程技術(shù)大學(xué)畢業(yè)論文 23 附錄 B Trademark protection parative study of legal framework Abstract： Trademark protection legal framework refers to a state of trademark protection purposes, protecting and trademark right way of basic arrangements. In this field, owing to historical and other reasons, the world of trademark protection legal framework displays diverse characteristics. Trademark rights obtained using the principle, type, have obtained at the same time, and registered with the registration made use of, Using the registration system, both will not registered trademark registered trademarks and unified in a mon umbrella under the singletrack, We have to protect registered trademark, the trademark law or tort law protection not registered trademark of double. Use principle on substantive justice, to protect the value of the trademark is registered, the principle of interest on the stability of the law and order and the trademark of certainty. Countries or regions in the basic framework of trademark protection, besides maintain rooted in their original system of legal tradition, also mutually absorb other system in fairness or economic and trade development trend. Key words:Trademark。the trademark protection。legal framework。trademark, legitimacy Trademark protection legal framework refers to a state of trademark protection purposes, protecting and trademark right way of basic arrangements. In this field, due to the different historical and other reasons, the law of the country have different basic problem, formed a unique trademark protection legal framework. So far, we have the basic system of the trademark law protection system and lack of theoretical depth research. With The study of trademark protection legal framework and its corresponding theoretical basis, to grasp the trademark law protection system. This paper tries to the trademark rights to form system as the center, take the parison research methods for trademark protection legal framework, the trademark rights formed in the world today, the analysis of the system of various types of these system in different historical background, legal 潘忠明：淺析利益平衡原理在商標(biāo)權(quán)中的運(yùn)用 24 tradition and theoretical basis, the advantages and disadvantages of the system of evaluation, and the trademark protection shall be the legal framework evolution. 1 The basic structure of trademark protection system World39。s trademark protection system presents the characteristics of diversification. This diversity is for trademark right principle is different, and the implementation of the registration system in the country, differentiation singletrack and new two different protection mode. Thus, each country (region) with the plicated trademark protection of legal framework. All sorts of legal system in limited protection and expansion of the protection of the different between the poles selected location. The problem (trademark protection led by the registered trademark protection) and unfair petition or fake protection of the relationship between plicated difference. Trademark right principle Firstly, this paper is to clear the trademark rights is discussed by the original. People are familiar with the property rights of the original way including possession, add echo processing, etc. Trademark protection of trademarks, the earliest history of the country by law provides protection to trademarks in judgemade law in public for the protection of trademark reputation, and the use of the trademark is set up. (note: here use means associated with the goods or services, and continuously use first use of trademark. The first is the expression of trademarks directly on goods, goods packaging or containers.) Directly inherited the British case law then have the further development of the American and French judgemade law in the 19th century, the theory of the case that the use of trademark is premise. Trademark By the early 20th century, the trademark has a kind of brandnew mode through specific administrative procedures, namely, trademark registration. So far, the trademark use (note: except for the right to produce according to law, in the trademark, use is still in the following two sense is emphasized as a trademark 遼寧工程技術(shù)大學(xué)畢業(yè)論文 25 registration: one is the condition, using the principles mainly refers to the country of the registration system for trademark registration. If the conditions of the provisions of the trademark law states. Another is a registered trademark of the existence conditions). Or registered trademark has bee two principles. The world trade anization of the tri agreement (hereinafter referred to as the trademark) also reflect TRIPs made of these two principles. This agreement under paragraph 1 of article 16 provisions in the registered trademark of the exclusive rights enjoyed by people all at the same time, based on the rights to use the recognition. In order to prevent consumer confusion, whether use principle or registered principle, in the same or similar goods or services of identical or similar trademarks shall be limited, namely the right to the exclusive rights related to give the first user or first. Therefore, the relations between the two principles can be used fo