【正文】 腳手架 安全施工方案 Fir st pliance r eview of t he applicat ion of t he appr aisal Com mit t ee, only t hr ough t he pliance r eview of t he applicat ion t o t ake par t in a det ailed r eview. 8. 1 applicat ion pliance r eview: does not m eet one of t he f olowing condit ions, pr ocur at or ial Agency t o subm it application t hr ough pliance r eviews, be invalidat ed: ( 1) applicat ion of t he f or mat s, content s, m eet t he r equir em ents of select ed f iles, power s of At tor ney, declar ations by t he legal r epr esent ative and t he t ender agent applicat ion t o m eet t he r equir em ent s。s ser vice char ges ( met er pr ices [ 2020]1980) of t endering agent39。 ( 6) no f r aud case. 8. 2 applicat ion r eview in det ail t he Evaluat ion Com m it t ee t hr ough pliance r eviews wil be select ed f or det ailed r eview of t he applicat ion. 8. 2. 1 t ender agent inst it ut ions similar pr oj ect ender per f or mance r equir ement s ( 16 point s) t ender agent inst it utions sim ilar pr oj ect t ender perf orm ance 16 point s, by t wo par t posit ion ( 1) agent sim ilar pr oj ect of cum ulat ive bid am ount scor ed calculat ion r ules f or : Agent wat er pr oject bid am ount ( on J anuar y 1, 2020 has has bid not ice f or associat e) cum ulat ive eac h r eached 100 m ilon Yuan have 2 point s, wat er pr oj ect cum ulat ive bid am ount scor ed up not over 6 point s. I n addit ion, plet es a bid wor t h m or e t han 500 m ilon yuan in t ot al 1 m inut e, but ot her it em s cor e accum ulat ed winning am ount up t o a m axim um of 6 point s. ( 2) calculat ion r ule f or t he num ber of agents sim ilar pr ojects: pr oxy bid am ount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ic e shall pr evail) bidding pr oj ects in m or e t han 50 m ilon Yuan by 2 po int s, but he Agency pr oj ect s t he num ber of scor es up t o 3 m inut es. 8. t o be agents of t he constr uction pr oj ect as a pr oj ect m anager in t he sam e pr oject per f or m ance ( 10 point s) Pr oj ect M anager agent per f orm ance scor es including agent s of t he bidding agencies of sim ilar pr oj ect s, as well as in ot her sim ilar pr oj ect t ender ing agency ser vice agent during per f orm ance. Tot al 10 Pr oj ect M anager agent per f or m ance, m ade up of t wo par t s ( 1) act ing like t he accum ulat ed winning am ount calculat ion r ule: agents f or wat er conser vancy pr oj ect bid am ount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice f or example) cumulat ive average r eached 100 m ilon Yuan 3 but scor ed no m or e t han 5 m inut es. ( 2) calculat ion r ule f or t he num ber of agent s im ilar pr oj ect s: pr oxy bid am ount ( since J anuary 1, 2020 winning not ice f or exam ple) in t he m or e t han 50 m ilon Yuan wat er conser vancy pr oj ect period of 3 m inut es, but scores t he num ber of agents sim ilar pr ojects up t o a m axim um of 5 point s. Pr oj ect M anager dem onst r at ed t o pr ovincial level and higher people39。 ( 3) t he similar pr oj ect endering agency agent num ber and pr ovide pr oof of m aterial pliance。s ser vice c har ges ( met er pr ices [ 2020] 1980) r ules of t he Ni h, t ender agent ser vice char ges using t he dif f erence pr ogressive bilng r at e. Charges in accordance wit h t he t ender ing agent 39。s ser vice fees. Tendering agent 39。 ( 6) no f r aud case. 8. 2 applicat ion r eview in det ail t he Evaluat ion Com m it t ee t hr ough pliance r eviews wil be select ed f or det ailed r eview of t he applicat ion. 8. 2. 1 t ender agent inst it ut ions similar pr oj ect ender per f or mance r equir ement s ( 16 point s) t ender agent inst it utions sim ilar pr oj ect t ender perf orm ance 16 point s, by t wo par t posit ion ( 1) agent sim ilar pr oj ect of cum ulat ive bid am ount scor ed calculat ion r ules f or : Agent wat er pr oject bid am ount ( on J anuar y 1, 2020 has has bid not ice f or associat e) cum ulat ive each r eached 100 m ilon Yuan have 2 point s, wat er pr oj ect cum ulat ive bid am ount scor ed up not over 6 point s. I n addit ion, plet es a bid wor t h m or e t han 500 m ilon yuan in t ot al 1 m inut e, but ot her it em s cor e accum ulat ed winning am ount up t o a m axim um of 6 point s. ( 2) calculat ion r ule f or t he num ber of agents sim ilar pr ojects: pr oxy bid am ount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice shall pr evail) bidding pr oj ects in m or e t han 50 m ilon Yuan by 2 po int s, but he Agency pr oj ect s t he num ber of scor es up t o 3 m inut es. 8. t o be agents of t he constr uction pr oj ect as a pr oj ect m anager in t he sam e pr oject per f or m ance ( 10 point s) Pr oj ect M anager agent per f orm ance scor es including agent s of t he bidding agencies of sim ilar pr oj ect s, as well as in ot her sim ilar pr oj ect t ender ing agency ser vice agent during per f orm ance. Tot al 10 Pr oj ect M anager agent per f or m ance, m ade up of t wo par t s ( 1) act ing like t he accum ulat ed winning am ount calculat ion r ule: agents f or wat er conser vancy pr oj ect bid am ount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice f or example) cumulat ive average r eached 100 m ilon Yuan 3 but scor ed no m or e t han 5 m inut es. ( 2) calculat ion r ule f or t he num ber of ag ent s im ilar pr oj ect s: pr oxy bid am ount ( since J anuary 1, 2020 winning not ice f or exam ple) in t he m or e t han 50 m ilon Yuan wat er c onser vancy pr oj ect period of 3 m inut es, but scores t he num ber of agents sim ilar pr ojects up t o a m axim um of 5 point s. Pr oj ect M anager dem onst r at ed t o pr ovincial level and higher people39。s ser vice char ges ( met er pr ices [ 202] 1980) of t endering agent 39。 t he f ile you select ed does not have t he r equir ed support ing documents, bidding agency acknowledged t he need t o pr ovide, or you can pr ovide. Pr oxy applicat i