【正文】
n the improvement。 ? If linked to skills transfer it could be worthwhile。 ? High face validity. Typical Research Questions ? The individuals who do not respond to the questionnaire or provide non usable data on the questionnaire are assumed to report no improvement/impact。 ? However a good first order analysis. Average Post Program 35 Average Pre Program 55 Time Complaints Sexual Harassment Prevention Program Formal Internal Complaints of Sexual Harassment O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O Trendline Analysis Trend line Use Case Study (Micro Electronics Incorporated) Practical Exercise Estimate of Impact by Key Role Players ? Easy to implement。 ? Because of this, value at the higher levels is seldom determined。 ? Line involvement (and mitment)。 ? Based on the assumption that participants are capable of determining or estimating how much of a performance improvement/impact is related to the intervention。 ? If capacity does not exist in the anization。 ? This approach has some disadvantages. Data from subordinates is subjective and may be questionable because of the possibility for biased input。 ? Can nontraining effects be isolated? ? What are the constraints in terms of using the data collection technique and isolation strategy. Credibility of Data is Influenced By: ? Reputation of the source of the data。 ? Scope of analysis. 。 ? Motives of the researchers。 ? In terms of this approach, the intervention claims credit for improvement that cannot be attributed to other factors。 ? Organization culture will determine whether the oute will be accepted。 ? Although an estimate, this value will usually have considerable credibility with management because participants are at the center of the change or improvement。 ? However not accurate as it does not isolate into other factors。ROI OF TRAINING Session 6 – Isolating the Results/Effects Of the Training Intervention PreAmble ? Isolating the results/effect of the training effort is the most difficult and also most important