【正文】 die, they just fade away.”Richard NixonIn 1973, after five years of talks, the United States and North Vietnam reached a peace agreement to end in years later, Saigon fell to North Vietnamese forces and Vietnam was unified under Communist ReaganIn 1984, Reagan called for an international ban on chemical years later, President Bush and Soviet leader Gorbachev would sign a historic agreement to cease production and begin destruction of both nations39。s policy of placing human rights records at the forefront of America39?！蔽恼碌哪┒芜€使用了“借代”(metonymy)的修辭手法——用 “偉大的頭腦”(great mind)代指有智慧的人。同時(shí)，它也是個(gè)巨大的負(fù)擔(dān)?！?If it weren’t for great mindsconstantly expanding our knowledge of the world, we would be a stagnant people, never moving forward and creating new and marvelous truly is a tool that can change the world and although it may sometimes be inconvenient, it is the most powerful thing we have.)這句話實(shí)現(xiàn)了從個(gè)體到一般，從特殊到普遍的升華，使得伽利略的單個(gè)事例具有了代表性。在論證過程中，作者很好地做到了抽象概念具體化。如今，我們把伽利略的發(fā)現(xiàn)歸于紀(jì)元以來最重要的科學(xué)發(fā)現(xiàn)之一。伽利略的理論遭遇了懷疑，憤怒，和暴力反對(duì)；它成了他極大的負(fù)擔(dān)。歷史上，知識(shí)給人帶來負(fù)擔(dān)，但最終被證明對(duì)人有益的事例并不鮮見。命題：知識(shí)有可能成為一種負(fù)擔(dān)，而不是福祉嗎？二、6分范文Knowledge is power。所謂反饋性在于寫的每一篇文章都要有專業(yè)修改，這可以幫助考生意識(shí)到忽略的評(píng)論要點(diǎn)和誤區(qū)。流利意味著語(yǔ)句通順，句子、段落之間邏輯銜接；完整意味著有開頭段、主體段及結(jié)尾段。這一點(diǎn)與閱讀部分的考查的目的題、主旨題相同，考生需要明確目標(biāo)文章使用了哪些論據(jù)－－數(shù)據(jù)、引用、個(gè)人經(jīng)歷等；哪些論證方法－－對(duì)比論證、例證、因果論證等；哪些修辭手法－－類比、明喻或者暗喻、重復(fù)等，這些專業(yè)術(shù)語(yǔ)的識(shí)別及拼寫必須在考前滾瓜爛熟掌握。與以前的寫作部分相比，新SAT寫作不需要考生針對(duì)某個(gè)觀點(diǎn)或現(xiàn)象給出主觀態(tài)度，它上升到賞析層面，這相當(dāng)于把一篇閱讀能出題的地方用連貫的文章呈現(xiàn)出來。SAT寫作這一項(xiàng)目往往是考生自以為簡(jiǎn)單，但實(shí)際上很難拿高分。官方指南上的滿分文章寫了五段，我們可以分析其中的第三段：第一句是本段主題句，提出Summers使用論據(jù)來說服讀者使用塑料袋是正確的行為；第二句依次列舉Summers引用的重要機(jī)構(gòu)及權(quán)威專家；第三句評(píng)價(jià)引用權(quán)威對(duì)提升論點(diǎn)可信度的作用；第四句列舉原文提到的數(shù)據(jù)；第五句評(píng)價(jià)提供數(shù)據(jù)的作用；第六句通過雙重否定體強(qiáng)調(diào)論據(jù)對(duì)議論文可信度的重要?！堕喿x很重要》The vicissitude of history never fails to amaze us with all the changes it has brought to human we trace back to see what has been changed since human civilization, seldom can we see anything that remains intact, with only one exceptionthe importance of the fact that reading has never dropped from our top priorities, few people keep the habit of a reaction to such pathetic phenomenon, writer Frank Bruni draws people’s attention back to reading and encourages people to value he employs include contrast, credible reference and tactic reasoning that appeal to people’s emotion and impressive feature of this article is Bruni’s contrast at the very beginning to introduce his topic, with the next paragraphs addressing its pares things that he always ignores such as nephew’s birthday and niece’s school production with things he never fails to the majority of people, especially teenagers, birthday party and school performance are events that family members should , this is not the case for the at this point, readers are left a bit disappointed at the author and tend to pay more attention to what he wants to convey the cusp of people’s attention, author Bruni brings about something that deserves greater emphasisreading: “I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more.” Thus the readers start to realize how justifiable the author isas nothing like a birthday party or a performance in school is parable with the importance of the utilization of this contrast, the author successfully draws the attention from the readers and lays a solid foundation for his later from this, the author’s careful choice of evidence adds credibility to the cites properly a report by Common Sense Media, claiming that three is a sharp decline in the percentage of teenagers read for fun “fewer than 20 percent of 17yearolds now read for pleasure”.At the same time, however, the number of the young who hardly ever read or never read for pleasure elevates from “only 8 percent of 13yearolds and 9 percent of 17yearolds” 30 years ago to “22 percent of 13yearolds and 27 percent of 17yearolds “ worrisome report indicates that the young no longer read as much as they used with the previous paragraphs, the author urges the reader to weight the disadvantage of such trend and possibly spurs some kind of , the inclusion of an authoritative agency backs up Bruni’s point, makes the work of Bruni believable and most exquisite technique of the passage, however, is its elaborate paragraph 8 to 15, the author lists all the possible benefits of reading to add weight to the persuasiveness of the starts from how reading benefit the brain in paragraph 8, that interviews indicate a symbiotic relationship between reading and 9 follows with a benefit to the qualities required to success, because those people who read are more adept at “ reading people” and “sizing up the social whirl around them”.If these benefits are not enough, in paragraph 10, 11, 12 and 13, the author pares reading with exposure to technological devices to indicate how reading would benefit the obvious benefit reading offers to the spirit is that reading smoothens people “wi