【正文】 ale of animal husbandr y industr y and technology developed count ries. M ar ket 1, the domestic mar ket f r om China39。s Gover nment or t he development and Ref orm Commission published t he winning bidder on t he designated m edia publicit y shal pr evail. 8. 2. 3 st af f r equir em ent ( 25 point s) 1, t o t he constr uction pr oj ect serving per sonnel, 4 years experience in t ender ing agent , 2 points per person, 2 years experience in t endering agent . . Pig is not a pig. Wit h domest ic nt er national m ar ket and t echnology big envir onm ent of changes, as China t radit ional indust r y of pig pr oduction of j ob way and pr of it way ar e r equir em ent s r elat ed industr y f or esour ces int egration, t o qualit y securit y f or pr em ise, r egulat ion based f arming, and m anagem ent cost and t he pr oduct ion, and sales cost, go standar dization, and scale, and int ensive, and m arket r oad, f ast upgrade whole indust ry chain of r egulation capacit y, m arket petit ion capacit y and anti risk capacit y. Fir st , indust ry analysis ( a) t he basic sit uation in China is a t r adit ional hog pr oduct ion and consum pt ion countr y, 2020 46. 15 milon t ons of pork, pig st ock milon head by t he end pig slaught er 609. 6 milon. Nat ional pig industr y39。 ( 5) ar e int ended t o t he agent of t he pr oject as a pr oj ect m anager has similar pr oj ects t he num ber of and r ef er ences t o m eet t he r equir em ent s。 (6) no f raud case. 8. 2 application r eview in detail t he Evaluat ion Commit tee t hrough pliance r eviews wil be select ed f or detailed r eview of t he application. 8. 2. 1 t ender agent insti utions im ilar pr oject tender per form ance r equir em ents ( 16 points) t ender agent inst it ut ions imilar pr oj ect ender per formance 16 point s, by t wo par t posit ion (1) agent similar project of cumulative bid amount scored calculation r ules f or : Agent water pr oj ect bid am ount ( on J anuary 1, 2020 has has bid not ice f or associate) cumulat ive each r eached 100 m ilon Yuan have 2 point s, water pr oj ect cumulative bid amount scored up not over 6 points. I n addit ion, plet es a bid wort h more t han 500 milon yuan in t otal 1 m inute, but ot her it ems score accumulated winning amount up to a maximum of 6 points. ( 2) calculat ion rule f or t he number of agent s imilar pr oj ects: pr oxy bid amount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice shal pr evail) bidding pr oj ects in mor e t han 50 milon Yuan by 2 point s, but he Agency pr oject s t he number of scores up t o 3 minutes. 8. 2. 2 t o be agents of t he const ruct ion project as a pr oject manager in t he same pr oject per form ance ( 10 points) Pr oject Manager agent perf ormance scores including agents of t he bidding agencies of sim ilar pr oject s, as well as in ot her sim ilar project t ender ing agency ser vice agent dur ing perf ormance. Total 10 Project Manager agent per formance, m ade up of t wo par ts (1) acting like t he accumulated winning amount calculat ion rule: agent s f or wat er cons er vancy project bid amount ( since J anuary 1, 2020 winning notice for example) cumulat ive average r eached 100 m ilon Yuan 3 but scored no m or e t han 5 m inut es. ( 2) calculat ion r ule f or t he number of agent s imilar pr oj ects: pr oxy bid amount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice f or example) in t he mor e t han 50 milon Yuan water conservancy project period of 3 m inut es, but scores t he number of agent s im ilar project s up t o a maximum of 5 point s. Project Manager demonstr ated t o provincial level and higher people39。s ser vice f ees. Tendering agent39。s er vice char ges ( meter pr ices [ 2020] 1980) r ules of t he Ni h, t ender agent ser vice charges using t he dif f er ence pr ogr essive bilng r at e. Char ges in accor dance wit h t he t endering agent39。 ( 3) t he sim ilar pr oj ect endering agency agent number and pr ovide pr of of material pliance。 ( 6) no f r aud case. 8. 2 application r eview in det ail t he Evaluat ion Commit t ee t hr ough pliance r eviews wil be select ed f or det ailed r eview of t he applicat ion. 8. 2. 1 t ender agent inst it ut ions imilar pr oj ect ender per formance r equir ements ( 16 point s) t ender agent inst it ut ions similar pr oj ect ender perf ormance 16 point s, by t wo par t posit ion ( 1) agent sim ilar project of cumulative bid amount scored calculation r ules f or : Agent water pr oj ect bid am ount ( on J anuar y 1, 2020 has has bid notice f or associate) cum ulative each r eached 100 milon Yuan have 2 point s, wat er pr oject cum ulative bid am ount scor ed up not over 6 point s. I n addit ion, pletes a bid wor t h m or e t han 500 m ilon yuan in t otal 1 minut e, but ot her it ems core accum ulat ed winning amount up t o a maxim um of 6 points. ( 2) calculation r ule f or t he num ber of agent s imilar pr oj ects: pr oxy bid am ount ( since J anuar y 1, 2020 winning not ice shal pr evail) bidding pr oj ects in m or e t han 50 milon Yuan by 2 points, but he Agency project s t he number of scor es up t o 3 minut es. 8. 2. 2 t o be agent s of t he constr uction pr oj ect as a pr oj ect m anager in t he sam e pr oj ect per formance ( 10 points) Pr oj ect M anager agent perf or mance scores including agents of t he bidding agencies of similar pr oj ect s, as well as in ot her sim ilar pr oj ect endering agency ser vice agent dur ing per form ance. Tot al 10 Pr oj ect M anager agent perf orm ance, made up of t wo part s ( 1) act ing like t he accum ulat ed winning amount calculation r ule: agents f or water conservancy pr oject bid am ount ( since J anuary 1, 2020 winning not ice f or exam ple) cum ulat ive average r eached 100 milon Yuan 3 but scored no m or e t han 5 m inut es. ( 2) calculat ion r ule f or t he number of agent s imilar pr oj ect s: pr oxy bid amount (since J anuary 1, 2020 winning notice f or