【正文】
Copyright Mercer Executive Resources Consulting, Asia 幅度重疊 Range Overlap (2) How much ? 多少 一個級別的幅度一般不超過三個其他級別的重疊 The range span of any one grade should not overlap much more than three other grades 169。 Copyright Mercer Executive Resources Consulting, Asia 年初 年中 年末 Start Year Mid End Year 年初 年中 年末 Start Year Mid End Year ?LAG 落后 ?LEAD 領(lǐng)先 ?LEADLAG 落后 領(lǐng)先之間 基本薪金政策 Base Pay Policy 169。 Email: 169。 Copyright Mercer Executive Resources Consulting, Asia 設(shè)定薪酬結(jié)構(gòu) Developing Salary Structure 169。 Copyright Mercer Executive Resources Consulting, Asia 建 立 競 爭 工 資 Develop Competitive Salaries 0500001000001500002022002500001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17RMB Grade PC 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 Grade or Position Class 一 個 等 級 = 一 個 標(biāo) 準(zhǔn) 工 資 One Grade = One Reference Salary 標(biāo) 準(zhǔn) 工 資 = 競 爭 報 酬 = 招 聘 標(biāo) 準(zhǔn) Reference Salary = Competitive Pay = Recruitment Standard C R G P C R m b41 1289342 1534943 1827444 2175645 2590146 3083747 3671348 4370849 5203750 6714651 7994052 9517453 11330854 13489955 16060456 19120657 227640169。 Copyright Mercer Executive Resources Consulting, Asia 幅度的重要性 Significance of Salary Range Q4 Q2 Q3 Q1 中點 = 競爭性工資 MidPoint = Competitive Pay Maximum 最高點 Minimum 最低點 一般期望 = 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)工資 Standard Expectation = Reference Salary Performance 工作表現(xiàn) Competencies 技能 Years in service 服務(wù)年期 169。 Copyright Mercer Executive Resources Consulting, Asia 幅度重疊 Range Overlap 1,200 1,000 800 1,800 1,500 1,200 1,800 2,250 2,700 Grade 1,200 1,000 800 1,350 1,125 900 1,000 1,250 1,500 Grade 1,200 1,000 800 1,500 1,250 1,000 1,250 1,563 1,875 Grade No overlap 沒有重疊 50% jump each promotion 每晉升 , 增加 50% Big overlap 大部分重疊 % jump each promotion 每晉升 , 增加 % Range overlap 重疊部分 = 67% 1,200 900 300 1,350 900 450 = = 67% Moderate overlap 適度重疊 25% jump each promotion 每晉升 , 增加 25% Range overlap 重疊部分 = 40% 1,200 1,000 200 1,500 1,000 500 = = 40% RMB RMB RMB 169。 Copyright Mercer Executive Resources Consulting, Asia 貴公司以及市場比較 Your Company vs the Market Comparison P o s itio n C lassYo u r C o m p an y T r en d lin eR eg r ess ed 2 5 t