【正文】 because of suffering(不雙寫 ) from making losses in business. The residents around the area where Monarch locates less like coffee than ones around Regal. 69. The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified pany. “Ten years ago our pany had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction panies—Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the building constructed by Zeta cost 30 percent more to build. However, that building?s expenses for maintenance last year were only half those of Alpha?s. In addition, the energy consumption of the Zeta building has been lower than that of the Alpha building every year since its construction. Given these data, plus the fact that Zeta has a stable workforce with little employee turnover, we remend using Zeta rather than Alpha for our new building project, even though Alpha?s bid promises lower construction costs. “Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the remendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the remendation.”?？Х葟d的空間可以通過撤銷兒童書籍的柜臺來獲得，由于最近的一次全國調(diào)查顯示 10 歲以下兒童在總?cè)丝谥兴嫉谋壤龑@著下降，因而兒童書籍很可能將不再好賣。 in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening the caf233。請?jiān)敿?xì)闡述這些問題的答案對于評估上文提出的建議有何作用。因此，要想讓你的房產(chǎn)賣的更快更好，你應(yīng)該選擇 Adams。 請?jiān)敿?xì)闡述這些問題的答案對于評估上文提出的建議有何作用。你所提出的解釋必須比已有的解釋更有說服力，同時(shí)還要說明為什么。 這表明那種所謂的 Palea 籃子并不是那里所獨(dú)有的。 寫一篇 response，在文章中，請你列舉出評價(jià)此篇 Argu 所需的具體論據(jù)，并解釋這些論據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化或是削弱此篇 Argu 的說服力的。 提綱： sample of rhesus monkeys is too limited to sufficiently support the argument generally. The 18 rhesus monkeys might just include the monkeys that suffer from some disease which leads a higher hormone coritisol level than those normal siblings. And there is no evidence provided by the arguer to imply those 18 rhesus monkeys are wholesome. 2. Even if the study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys produce up to twice as much of the hormone cortisol as do their younger siblings, we still cannot hastily reach the conclusion that birth order has effects on an individual?s levels of stimulation. Because obviously the firstborn infant monkeys is older than siblings, which might leads to more active reaction to stimulating, while no explanation about the time when the test was conducted is listed by the author. Meanwhile, as a control experiment, the method above is insufficient to convince us that conclusion. The birth order must be the uniquely different condition on this experiment. , the author imply that the hormone cortisol, which primes the body for increased activity levels, is the criteria of estimation of an individual?s levels of stimulation. While this point does not absolutely convince us, at least, no evidence was provided by the author in this argument. 4. As to the study ,which found that during pregnancy, firsttime mother monkeys had higher levels of cortisol than did those who had had several offspring, while the firsttime mother monkey would give birth to a firstborn infant monkey, a concrete connection between the mother?s higher levels of stimulation and the infant?s is not effectively made. Though higher levels of stimulation appears in firsttime mother monkeys, the possibility of firstborn infant monkeys with lower levels of stimulation still cannot be entirely ruled out. Besides, we are not sure whether the higher levels of cortisol in firsttime mother monkeys results from the birth order or the reaction led to by the worried mood of firsttime pregnancy. Summarily, the conclusion that the birth order effects an individual?s levels of stimulation is weakened by some evidence provided in this argument. One or more alternative explanations could rival the proposal explanation. To strengthen the author? point, he or she must provide facts that… following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner. Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism(破壞公物 ) throughout the plaza. Thus, we remend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels.(反證法 ) Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the remendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the remendation. 題目翻譯： 以下內(nèi)容來自 Central Plaza 的一位商鋪店主給某編輯的一封信。 提綱 : author reports Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza by making referencing to the poll of store owners there. But we are told nothing about how well it represent the public opinions and the way the poll was conducted. We may well ask what fraction of the whole Central Plaza store owners is the ones who are prone to attribute(/owe/ascribe) the decrease in their business to the number of skateboard users. Even if the number of store owners who plain about the skateboard users is large, it does not strengthen the author?s opinion under the circumstance of smal