【正文】
obligor39。 the People39。s Court shall not enforce the claim to the extent the claimed amount exceeds the actual amount owed. Article 22 In a suit of subrogation, if the obligor also brings a claim against the secondary obligor for the difference between the amount owed to it and the amount in subrogation claimed by the obligee, the People39。s claim, if the People39。s Court, an obligee names only the secondary obligor as the defendant without also naming the original obligor as an interested third party, the People39。 where such suit does not ply with Article 13 hereof, the court shall direct the obligee to bring a separate suit in the People39。s right due to it, the secondary obligor shall bear the burden of proof. Article 14 Where an obligee brings a suit of subrogation pursuant to Article 73 of the Contract Law, jurisdiction shall vest in the People39。s right against a third party that was due, thereby harming the obligee in Article 73 of the Contract Law refers to the following circumstance: The obligor fails to render performance which is due to the obligee, and further, it has failed to enforce a creditor39。s right of the obligor is due。 2. the obligor39。 if the relevant law or administrative regulation requires that a certain contract be registered without subjecting its effectiveness to such registration, then failure to effect registration shall not impair the effectiveness of the contract, provided that such failure constitutes an impediment to the conveyance of title to, or any other real right in, the subject matter of the contract. In the case of amendment, assignment or termination of a contract as set forth in Paragraph 2 of Article 77, Article 87, and Paragraph 2 of Article 96 of the Contract Law, the provisions of the previous Paragraph shall apply. Article 10 Where the parties have entered into a contract the subject matter of which was outside their scope of their business, the People39。 where the lapse was less than one year, the time limit during which the party may bring a suit shall be two years. Article 7 In a dispute arising out of a technology import/export contract, where infringement of the right of a party occurred before the operative date of the Contract Law, if there was a lapse of more than two years between the date on which the party knew or should have known that its right was infringed and the operative date of the Contract Law, the People39。s Court may only invalidate a contract in accordance with laws adopted by the National People39。s Court in respect of a dispute arising out of a contract formed after the operative date of the Contract Law, the provisions of the Contract Law shall apply。s Republic of China (One) which were adopted at the 1090th Session of the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People39。s Court of Certain Issues Concerning the Application of the Contract Law of the People39。Interpretations of the Supreme People39。s Court Document No Fa Shi [1999] Effe