【正文】 企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價系統(tǒng)的構(gòu)成要素 (1) 評價主體 企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價都是由特定主體進行的、有特定目的的評價活動，這是經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價的原動力問題，它是以對企業(yè)及其相關(guān)利益主體的認識為基礎(chǔ)的。按照業(yè)績評價的主體和目的的不同，業(yè)績評價可以細分為以下四個方面：資源提供者 (包括投資者、債權(quán)人和職工等 )對于經(jīng)營業(yè)績的評價；潛 在投資者對作為投資對象的企業(yè)的價值分析；政府管理 部門進行的以企業(yè)所提供的稅金、環(huán)保等為主要內(nèi)容的社會貢獻評價；經(jīng)營者進行的內(nèi)部管理業(yè)績評價。對企業(yè)的評價關(guān)系到企業(yè)是擴張、維持、重組、收縮或退出；對經(jīng)營者的評價關(guān)系其薪酬、獎懲、升降等問題。在企業(yè)經(jīng)營者業(yè)績評價的基礎(chǔ)上，制定合理的報酬計劃，提高企業(yè)經(jīng)營者的收入，有利于激發(fā)其工作積極性。既有財務(wù)方面的，又有非 財務(wù)方面的；既可以定量指標反映，又可以定性指標反映。評價標準是在一定前提下產(chǎn)生的，隨著社會的不斷進步，經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展以及外部條件的變化，評價的目的、范圍和出發(fā)點也會發(fā)生變化，作為評價判斷尺度的評價標準也會發(fā)生變化。目前常見的業(yè)績評價標準有：年度預(yù)算標準、資本預(yù)算標準、歷史水平標準、競爭對手標準。沒有科學．合理的評價方法，評價指標和評價標準就成了孤立的評價要素，也就失去了其存在的意義。 (2)有效加強對企業(yè)經(jīng)營過程的監(jiān)管與優(yōu)化。 4 企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價指標體系的構(gòu)建 隨著社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，企業(yè)的經(jīng)營環(huán)境發(fā)生著前所未有的變化，企業(yè)的經(jīng)營管理理念和方法正在經(jīng)歷一場深刻的革命。 我國為適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟體制改革發(fā)展的要求，自 20 世紀 80 年代開始重視企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價問題的研究，如 1993 年財政部頒布的《企業(yè)財務(wù)通則》所設(shè)計的財務(wù)指標體系由流動比率等 8 項指標構(gòu)成； 1994 年國有資產(chǎn)管理局等部門頒布了以資產(chǎn)保值增值為核心的 4 項指標體系； 1995 年財政部頒布的企業(yè)經(jīng)濟效益評價指標體系由銷售利潤率等 10 項指標構(gòu)成； 1999 年財政部等四部委頒布了《國有資本金效績評價規(guī)則》和《國有資本金效績評價操作細則》，對國有企業(yè)業(yè)績評價進行了重新規(guī)范，重點評價企業(yè)財務(wù)效益狀況、資產(chǎn)營運狀況、償債能力狀況和發(fā)展能力狀況四個方面，由凈資產(chǎn)收益率等 8 項基本指標、資本保值增值率等 16 項修正指標和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)班子基本素質(zhì)等 8 項評議指標三個層次構(gòu)成，全面反映企業(yè)的生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營狀況和經(jīng)營者的業(yè)績； 2021 年財政部五部委修訂的《企業(yè)效績評價操作細則》由凈資產(chǎn)收益率等 28 項指標組成，提高了對企業(yè)償債能力和發(fā)展創(chuàng)新能力的評價，使該評價體系更為客觀公正，更具有可操作性。其次，評價體系在權(quán)重設(shè)計上沿用了傳統(tǒng)的專家調(diào)查 法 (德爾菲法 )確定各指標的固定權(quán)重方法，依據(jù)受托責任理論，業(yè)績評價需求主體應(yīng)當包括資產(chǎn)所有者，重大利益相關(guān)方及企業(yè)本身，對于不同的需求主體，各個指標的相對重要程度是不一致的，因此，應(yīng)設(shè)計多重權(quán)數(shù)體系，明確規(guī)定其適用對象和范圍，以滿足業(yè)績評價工作的現(xiàn)實需求。 (2) 企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價指標體系的構(gòu)建設(shè)想 我國企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價系統(tǒng)的構(gòu)建，應(yīng)在借鑒國外發(fā)達國家相對成熟的評價體系基礎(chǔ)上，致力于將其與中國國情結(jié)合起來，形成科學性、操作性、適用性兼容的業(yè)績評價體系。構(gòu)建業(yè)績評價系統(tǒng)的理論框架，界定業(yè)績評價的不同主體與視角，明確評價目標。未來的業(yè)績評價指標發(fā)展將在尋找企業(yè)價值動因的基礎(chǔ)上，構(gòu)建一種框架體系，有效“組合”多種指標，而該體系的構(gòu)建是依賴經(jīng)濟學或管理學理論，會計學者是從那里獲取養(yǎng)分來思考業(yè)績評價指標的。因此，企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績評價系統(tǒng)應(yīng)包括企業(yè)經(jīng)營效益水平的評價和經(jīng)營者業(yè)績的評價兩個層面，采用多層次指標體系和多因素逐項修正的方法，全面和深入地分析涉及企業(yè)經(jīng)營和發(fā)展的諸多因素。 業(yè)績評價應(yīng)建立在客觀真實的會計信息基礎(chǔ)之上。業(yè)績評價時應(yīng)注重過程的合法性，合理性和 科學性，并在相關(guān)的考核方案沒計和業(yè)績評價指標選擇中注重加強對會計信息產(chǎn)生全過程的考核。 附錄 B Discussion on the Construction of Enterprise Performance Evaluation System Enterprises as profit anization whose goal is the pursuit of economic efficiency, economic efficiency of enterprises embodied in the operating results on. Performance, also known as performance, performance, effectiveness, etc., reflect the people engaged in an activity or results achieved, results of operations during a given period is the use of its limited resources to engage in business activities, results achieved, showing business efficiency and the performance in two ways. Ci Hai to evaluate the explanation is: Assessment of the price of goods, bargaining. This also means to measure the value of people or things. Price is the moary value of the performance evaluation is actually a process of determining value, the such as Modern Chinese Dictionary in the explanation: evaluation is the level of assessed value, assessed value in the evaluation of management activities is measured according to the goals set the properties of the object system, and this property into an objective quantitative value or subjective utility behavior. Evaluation of people or things as the value of determining a concept of sexual activity, including the identification of evaluation purposes, the selected evaluation criteria (or assessment reference system) to obtain the evaluation information, the formation of value judgments in four areas. Enterprise Performance refers to the use of scientific, standardized method of evaluation index system with a specific, uniform standard of parison, in accordance with certain procedures, quantitative and qualitative analysis, enterprises must operate during the operational efficiency and the performance to real, objective, prehensive and fair evaluation. It yes evaluation theory method in economic sphere, specific about applications in the accounting and financial management based on economic principles and modern using measurement analysis technology built Qiyejingying Guocheng analysis truly reflected the reality enterprise economy, forecast business prospects for the future development of a science. Establishment and implementation of enterprise business performance evaluation system, and scientific evaluation business results, will help guide the business operations right, to help panies find business gap and the causes of economic efficiency. Meanwhile, the relevant departments for the implementation of indirect management of enterprises, strengthening macrocontrol, the formulation of economic policy and performance assessment provide the basis for enterprise managers. Enterprise Performance Evaluation System and implementation must be based on some theoretical basis, consistent with certain principles in order to play its good features, so that the performance evaluation of objective, fairness, reasonable. 1 Business Performance Evaluation System Theory (A) Capital preservation theory In a market economy, enterprises are funded by the pany, is an aggregation of capital, the owner is the only remaining risk and the residual interest in the enjoyment of those benefits is the highest investor interest. Direct the performance of enterprises seek maximum benefits for the maximum capital gain, required to recover the capital with as small as possible to get as much as possible the interests of big capital. Enterprise Performance evaluation of a basic premise of the enterprise to maximize capital appreciation. Therefore, the choice of capital maintenance concept constitutes an important theoretical basis for performance evaluation. Increasing the value of capital in real terms is to achieve maximum capital gains, is the state capital management fee ine and the relationship between the specific embodi ment of the capital with as small as possible to get the advance as far as possible the interests of big capital. Therefore, the fee ine and the contrast between a business performance evaluation of the basic forms of expression. (B) The principalagent theory Agent theory, a number of busine