精神損害賠償論文外文翻譯-其他專業(yè)-全文預覽
【正文】 isability. It is also often based on the premise that workers will lie, andthat those who evaluate the claims will be unable to disprove the right to benefits. The result is the application of rules designed to underpensate, rather thanto overpensate. When proof of etiology cannot be scientifically confirmed, mistakes will be made. The choice of policymakers is to risk overpensation insome cases, or to guarantee underpensation in all cases. Today, in most Canadianjurisdictions, it is impossible to deny that many legitimate claims are being refused,and that policy itself is often to refuse the legitimate claim, sometimes in clearviolation of the letter or the spirit of the statute. 同其他地方一樣，在加拿大壓力 賠償 的問題 被 賠償委員會和雇主 雙方視為 怪物。在 法規(guī)明確界定了起于雇傭過程中產(chǎn)生的 精神損害 的 省 份 ，令人驚訝的是 ，不論它們是否有道理，人們 必須面對 針對長期壓力索賠的一切形式的直接 拒絕。SPECIFICITIES OF THE CANADIAN APPROACH 加拿大方式的具體體現(xiàn) When studying the Canadian approach to pensation for stress related disease,one is struck by the Compensation Boards39。這些區(qū)別可能影響索賠 的 申請和評估的方式， 并且 在某些情況下 ，它們 實際上 被用作把法律的規(guī)則改變 為舉證責任 ，甚至作為 給予賠償 性 工傷 的概念。 In Canada, as elsewhere, the issue of pensation for stress is seen as a bugbearboth by Compensation Boards and by employers. Because the sources of psychological stress are usually measured by selfreporting, and because the resulting disabilitycan not be Xrayed or corroborated with the techniques traditionally used to evaluatephysical disability, there is a seemingly universal fear that employers will end uppaying for disabilities that are not workrelated. This fear is partially based on thefact that most psychological disabilities have multiple etiologies, and that no scientifictechniques can be used to separate out the different factors contributing t
公司管理相關推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1