【正文】
he papers when the exam ended. “That test was not only a test of knowledge, but also a test of moral (道德) . We wanted to show students how important honesty (誠實(shí)) is, ”said Cai Wenguo, the school’s headmaster. The school says no cheating (作弊) happened in the test. Next year, it wants 80% of its exams to be without teachers. But st udents have different ideas. “I was happy and excited during the exam because my teachers trusted (信任) me, ”said Lang Yudan, a 13yearold girl in Class 11. “Schools must trust students a lot not to use invigilators (監(jiān)考人) . But I think it is too early. Some students will cheat if there are no invigilators. And the students will not be able to ask for help when needed. ”said Hua Sha. “I don’t like having invigilator s in exams. When they walk around the classroom, they make me nervous. I would get higher marks without them in the room because I would feel more relaxed. ”Liu Qingxi said. “I think it’s very important to have invigilators in exams. Many students want to check their answers with each other after they have finished papers. And they can also keep the classroom in order when something unusual happens. They may make me nervous, but I still think we need them. ”ShangGuanyuan said. Not using invigilators may be a good idea. But before using it, schools must tell students the im