【正文】
ents concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿號(hào)). Those ments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied ments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s ments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s ments:Reviewer 1: 1. Response to ment: (……簡要列出意見……)Response: 2. Response to ment: (……簡要列出意見……)Response: 。 scope of the study and while making conclusion, it is to be mentioned how the study is useful for the practical purposes. In addition the following are the few suggestions/ments, which may be included while revision.1. Introduction part first para last line, author must avoid to write ambiguous statement ., much work is still ahead, may indicate properly.2. Author could not demonstrate the reason why, to select the organic pound such as ethyl pyruvate for this study? 3. Experimental part: It is difficult to understand the insitu RAIRS experiments with homemade liquidsolid RAIRS cell. More detailed information may be useful for the others those who are working in the area. Photograph of the assembled cell may be included.4. The description given for the experimental set up (page 4) can be presented by flow diagram instead, as an ease to understand the set up. 5. Resluts Part (Page 6): CO adlayers with identical monolayer coverages, the monolayer coverage, is it been performed with some adsorption model? Further, it was suggested that COsaturated Pt surface, but not mentioned about the saturation experiments. Is it obtained after 60 min of CO bubbling?6. Page 12, 2nd para: The displacement of EtPy by CCl4 flushing, is it confirmed by the EtPy peaks? If so, it has to be mentioned clearly in the para. Also in the same para, author referred for Fig. 7a and 7b but in the figures, it didn39。因此,作者就是要修改句子,使表達(dá)不引起歧義??吹?